User talk:EmRunTonRespNin/Archive 1

Unspecified source for Image:Satan, First Angel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Satan, First Angel.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nandesuka 21:18, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

300 (film)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --  tariq abjotu  20:43, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:McDuck Castle.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:McDuck Castle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Holly Body
I have nominated Holly Body, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Holly Body. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Redfarmer (talk) 19:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

HELP US MAKING THE PROJECT OF ANCIENT GREEK WIKIPEDIA
We are the promoters of the Wikipedia in Ancient Greek. we need your help, specially for write NEW ARTICLES and the TRANSLATION OF THE MEDIAWIKI INTERFACE FOR ANCIENT GREEK, for demonstrating, to the language subcommittee, the value of our project.

Thanks a lot for your help. Ἡ Οὐικιπαιδεία needs you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.40.197.5 (talk) 19:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Sourcing/BLP
Please MAKE SURE you source any claims you add to the article particularly concerning living people. In particular your change here was HIGHLY inappropriate as you did not add any refs to support the claim. As it stands, the ref provided didn't even mention any charge but thats not your fault. The ref I found which is Greek and used in the article does in fact say he was charged with intentional manslaughter. Another ref I found and added also mentions manslaughter not murder. I don't care whether all Greek media says he was charged with murder, unless you provide a reliable secondary source, be it Greek or otherwise DO NOT make unsupported claims particularly about living people in wikipedia articles. Nil Einne (talk) 12:34, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, the sources are plain wrong, 'cause it's been going around since yesterday in the media in Greece that he was charged with intentional murder. The Internet sources have got it wrong as it so often happens with "raw" information fresh from the sight. I won't change it back for lack of Internet sources, but it will soon be corrected. --Chatzaras (talk) 13:16, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Anarcho-Dandyism.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Anarcho-Dandyism.jpg

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 04:54, 14 April 2013 (UTC)