User talk:Emalgiar

In response to your feedback
The editor who removed your edit left a message in the edit summary. Look at the history of the article to see it. Basically your addition would be better if you provided a source; see WP:RS and WP:ILC.

Ariconte (talk) 02:48, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

&#160; Welcome!

Hello, Emalgiar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ariconte (talk) 02:52, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Phil Spector, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ''Your reference is not a valid reference. Please do not add your personal opinions in the article.'' Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 03:16, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
Hi Emalgiar. I can't speak for User:Dr.K., but I suspect he deleted your addition because the reference supplied suggests your statement is effectively original research: that is to say, you've listened to the Let It Be soundtrack and believe the songs sound as though they have been stripped of Spector's production. However, that isn't sufficient to support the claim - what's required is a reference to a reliable source that states, "The songs in the film are verions recorded prior to Spector's involvement," or something similar.

I hope this makes things a little clearer; feel free to contact me or ask at the helpdesk if you want to discuss it further.

Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 09:53, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

&#160;


 * I just noticed this. FWIW you made an excellent point Yunshui, and in fact you did speak for me as well. These were exactly my thoughts. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 13:32, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
I suggest visiting my guide for new users here.

SwisterTwister  talk  06:06, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

&#160;