User talk:Emandudeguyperson

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rusko (musician), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Arthena(talk) 07:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Emandudeguyperson! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:


 * Introductory tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Writing an article
 * Five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Community portal
 * Task Center
 * Help pages
 * The Teahouse (newcomer help)
 * Main help desk

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes ( ~ ) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 44 Cats; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 05:00, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Sir, after seeing your history of getting in fights with other users, I find your comments and your threats to be totally out of line and out of step with Wikipedia community guidelines. I have no intention of reporting you whatsoever but I am telling you that if you do have the ability to block me from editing, it cannot be due to a dispute which you are directly involved in as per Administrators and one cannot just refuse to respond to dispute to arbitration and be considered in the right as per Dispute_resolution, etc. This stuff is like small claims court and no insignificant issue to be ignored. I have been trying to bring about constructive edits to Wikipedia and remove vandalism and now you want to put a big "get off my lawn" sign on my talk page for some reason.

I cited the source for the first handful of times in an incorrect manner, which was incorrect for me to do. I falsely labeled TV Azteca as one of the Original networks that airs this 44 Cats series I am not even interested in in the slightest. That is why my post was reverted a number of times at first, because of my mistake. Now I am simply stating the truth: TV Azteca airs 44 Cats through Broadcast Syndication, they are not original proprietors of the show. At this point I am not in a rush to revert my edits back, and will probably have to find another way to word the TV Azteca part just so this "reverting crime" can be avoided, because as I've said I have no interest in winning but I do know what the facts are and the facts are that "syndication deal(s)" are considered significant as per the rules that you showed me.

best wishes,

Emandudeguyperson Emandudeguyperson (talk) 05:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)