User talk:Emdad Tafsir

May 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. regentspark (comment) 16:58, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Jakob Tower moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Jakob Tower, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheImaCow (talk) 06:45, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello, I'm Vinegarymass911. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Char Fasson Govt. College seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 12:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Hey, I'm Emdad Tafsir. I Would like to share, that the edit you made it was nothing but a domination. I, as a student of this college made changes which was proper and appropriate Written with a view of a third party. It was a translation of bangla wikipedia also. But without proper reason you removed my entryies which was made with a jaundiced eye. Thanks Emdad Tafsir (talk) 12:44, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Your UTRS Account
You have no wikis in which you meet the requirements for UTRS. Your account has been removed and you will be required to reregister once you meet the requirements. If you are blocked on any wiki that UTRS uses, please resolve that before registering agian also. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:55, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Char Fasson Govt. College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Degree ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Char_Fasson_Govt._College check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Char_Fasson_Govt._College?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Hazari Gonj Hamidia Fazil Madrasah
This information is not all in this source: Liberation war Bhola|first=Untold story of|title=Untold story of liberation war Bhola. Please don't add again without third-party sources. George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 12:51, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

This is not the only source I have more third party source Emdad Tafsir (talk) 12:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Hazariganj Union moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Hazariganj Union, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 22:41, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Good Article
See this Good article nominations to learn how to take your article to GA status.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 00:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Free basics
I think you need to read IP block exemption. This is nothing to do with the spam blacklist. Guy (help!) 16:01, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Why free basics is listed as spam? Though I can contribute in Bangla wiki with free basics. Emdad Tafsir (talk) 01:26, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Emdad Tafsir, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Char Fasson Upazila have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Bhola Govt. College ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Bhola_Govt._College check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Bhola_Govt._College?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Environment and Bangla
 * Paschim Jinnahgarh Nuria Alim Madrasah ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Paschim_Jinnahgarh_Nuria_Alim_Madrasah check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Paschim_Jinnahgarh_Nuria_Alim_Madrasah?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to SSC and HSC

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Solved Emdad Tafsir (talk) 07:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Charfassion Karamatia Kamil Madrasah moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Charfassion Karamatia Kamil Madrasah, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 18:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Char Fasson Govt. College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BDT ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Char_Fasson_Govt._College check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Char_Fasson_Govt._College?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Shashibhushan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shashibhushan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shashibhushan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 04:14, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Your addition to Charfashion Govt. T. Baret Secondary School has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Moneytrees🌴Talk🌲Help out at CCI! 20:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aslampur Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union Council ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Aslampur_Union check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Aslampur_Union?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Charfashion Govt. T. Baret Secondary School


A tag has been placed on Charfashion Govt. T. Baret Secondary School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://index.nearschool.org/school/charfashion-govt-tbaret-secondary-school. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Your recent editing history at Islam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – 2 . O . Boxing  00:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

You've already breached 3RR, but I haven't reported you as nobody has left you a warning. There's a possibility you may be blocked anyway, but if you revert one more time, you'll definitely be blocked. – 2 . O . Boxing  00:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Zakir Naik; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''This has been going on for long and you don't seem to be interested in any collaborative editing at all. If this behavior continues any further then your editing privileges will be revoked.'' &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  02:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * And now it appears that you're using a sockpuppet/meatpuppet to aid you in an edit war. Either you stop this behavior immediately and start editing in a collaborative manner or your editing privileges will be revoked completely. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  10:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

I have just added citations what's wrong with that? Emdad Tafsir (talk) 10:15, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Islam
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Islam, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. Regards Meganpeltz (talk) 05:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long term edit warring, using sockpuppets in an edit war, inability to edit collaboratively.. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  17:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

I admitting that I was dominant in editing, I wont go in edit war anymore. And I will be collaborative also. And one more request when other users are reverting more than one month old edits which was edited with proper logic but they are reverting without any valid reason what should I do? Emdad Tafsir (talk) 03:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

see the recent edit one Zakir Naik I never sockpuppeted on that page. Now they are restoring my valid edits with proper summary without any reason. Is it fare? Emdad Tafsir (talk) 04:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You only need one open unblock request; additional comment should just be plain comments. How will you handle editing disputes in the future? 331dot (talk) 08:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

I will start an open discussion in the talk page and will mention them that without a consensus Please don't change anything and let's talk about the disputes. I am requesting an open unblock request. Emdad Tafsir (talk) 08:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC)


 * You've been given advice already on unblock requests and you can't even follow that. You have not addressed any of the points put to you. Note that basic competence is required to edit the encyclopaedia. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  09:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The editor tried to appeal their block to me via email. The appeal was content free, so I've withdrawn email access as well. Your only option is WP:UTRS, but seeing that once again you have demonstrated that you cannot follow instructions I rate your chances at zero. MER-C 12:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Reg your email to me, I'm not going to restore talk page access. One just has to look above to see that you either don't understand what you're being told or you don't want to listen to what you're being told. Please see WP:UTRS for further appeals, and listen to the advice you've been given. If you continue with these kind of appeals there then your access to that avenue may also be revoked. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  12:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

restoring talk page access. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:42, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Unblock Request
Emdad Tafsir (talk) 17:19, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry was confirmed and is not in doubt. See Sockpuppet investigations/Emdad Tafsir/Archive. I have re-revoked your talk page access. If your current request is declined, the next time you'll be eligible to make an unblock request would be 2023-06-25, and only if you refrain from any further block evasion. At that time, you'll need to account for your attempt to mislead us. --Yamla (talk) 17:33, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #80085
Restore TPA yet again. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for using the Unblock Ticket Request System. I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. This requires greater discussion than is possible via UTRS. Please concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here ".
 * Deepfriedokra -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Remember, Emdad Tafsir, you attempted to mislead us on 2022-12-24 and have not yet addressed this. You must directly address this. Your UTRS request only talked about your abuse of multiple accounts but did not address your attempt to lie about this. --Yamla (talk) 17:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I am remorseful for what I did, and on December 24, 2022, all I wanted was to get unblocked; that's the only reason I prevaricated.
 * In UTRS, I have admitted why I did it and now how I want to contribute to enriching Wikipedia, but I forgot to clarify the above-mentioned date incident.
 * I tried to clarify my side, and I am humbly waiting to contribute to Wikipedia again. Thank you. Emdad Tafsir (talk) 04:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Yamla
 * Deepfriedokra Emdad Tafsir (talk) 15:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Please address it all in a new unblock request. Please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "
 * . &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)