User talk:Emelydd/Occipital gyri/Annakaji Peer Review

Emelydd, MillerNick, Cescilyjo, & Sarinisaksena haven't added anything. The Lead is good, but doesn't support rest of article because there is no rest of article to summarize. There's not much content, but what's there is good. There is good tone & balance. The first source needs a functional link & the third source is not current (1977). Once more content is added, there should be clear sections, such as "components," "development," "discovery," and so on. The content added has improved the overall quality of the article, is concise, and is from a reliable source. It's good, but more content is needed in general.