User talk:EmeraldCrowhawk

Welcome!
Hello, EmeraldCrowhawk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Modius (headdress) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Tacyarg (talk) 20:43, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Xylitol, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Read WP:MEDRS. You need a strong medical source for the comment you added.'' Zefr (talk) 01:42, 31 March 2023 (UTC)


 * All information is sourced from Wikipedia itself referenced by the linked topics. EmeraldCrowhawk (talk) 02:12, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * WP:CITE: "Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged ... anywhere in article space."
 * Wikipedia should make a statement supported by a source understandable to a common, non-medical user. I'm an informed reader, but it's not obvious to me whether there is a MEDRS source for the content you added or if experts would say that. Don't infer that the reader is going to assemble the concepts alone. State the concept simply and provide a reputable review to confirm it. Thanks. Zefr (talk) 04:06, 31 March 2023 (UTC)