User talk:Emerg007

Welcome!

Hello, Emerg007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Doc Quintana (talk) 04:20, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

May 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:27, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Emerg007 (talk) 05:44, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

i get what you're saying. When making revisions do we continue to give the same reasoning? Different users keep on making the same biased and opinionated reversions. Is there a point where we can't do anything? Or is this where, as you explained, revisions must be made farther apart? Emerg007 (talk) 05:44, 12 May 2010 (UTC)


 * At that point, what you do is follow instructions at Dispute resolution, whose goal is to draw more editors into the dispute to arrive at a consensus. You see, the problem is what happens when two editors or sides both feel that their revision is better, and the other editor/side's revision is biased and opinionated. We (administrators) obviously can't just let the revert war continue without end, and we also aren't going to declare one side the winner based on our own biases. So what we do is insist that everone stop edit warring, and instead use dispute resolution to get more opinions on the issue. Someguy1221 (talk) 09:24, 12 May 2010 (UTC)