User talk:EmerilHut

User talk goes here.

Ernest Angley
I would take issue with calling it "unconstructive". It wasn't disruptive, it wasn't biased, and moreover it was sourced. It may be incorrect but "unconstructive" is a bit much. - 174.46.204.210 (talk) 17:11, 7 December 2010 (UTC)But that's what

Also, it seems to me that the Wikian thing to do would be to sofixit, not deletionism. Alas. - 174.46.204.210 (talk) 17:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I wasn't the editor that said your comment in that article was "unconstructive". I would not have thought of it that way. It was simply incorrect. In any case, the revert was made and after finding out who was sampled in that song, I'm sure you agree with the removal, but I understand your thoughts on how it should've been removed.EmerilHut (talk) 18:18, 7 December 2010 (UTC)