User talk:EmetHodge

WP:NPOV violation
EmetHodge, the changes you have been making to the Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine page are very POV. I strongly recommend that when you remove large amounts of content from an article as you did that you explain why you did so on the edit summary. I say this because the content you removed has properly cited information that has been vetted and is correct while the information you have been attempting to replace it with is rather biased, poorly sourced, and written like an essay among other problems with it in terms of factual accuracy. I urge you to please not do it again, thank you. TylerDurden8823 (talk) 17:19, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Your edits have not been an honest and unbiased representation of Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine. Your edits have been submitted in an essay-like format not fitting for an encyclopedia and have been riddled with biased language such as the conflation of osteopaths with Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine, oversimplifying differences (subtle ones today) between Doctors of Medicine and Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine, and lastly the current version is not anything like literature promoting DOs. The information is well-cited, vetted by editors from other articles, and defines DOs as exactly what they are-medical physicians equivalent to MDs. The language you use does not convey that message one bit. Furthermore, many of your claims are inaccurate or overblown. Please refrain from massive deletions of content which is just fine and replacing it with your own POV version. The reference regarding chelation therapy for example is very old and outdated data and serves only to misrepresent the osteopathic medical community. TylerDurden8823 (talk) 20:23, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:17, 6 July 2012 (UTC)