User talk:Emijrp

Draft:Constantino Salinas concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Constantino Salinas, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Dovlat Film Fond for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dovlat Film Fond is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dovlat Film Fond until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. leilahuseynova (talk) 06:09, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Constantino Salinas


Hello, Emijrp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Constantino Salinas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 10:31, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Haghefilm Foundation


A tag has been placed on Haghefilm Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Franco Manzecchi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Franco Manzecchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Franco Manzecchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti (talk) 17:20, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Best wishes
Hello, it looks like you recently retired from Wikipedia. Seems like you did a lot on here, so sad to see. Hope things are well and maybe you will be back one day. - Indefensible (talk) 23:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Radharc Archive


The article The Radharc Archive has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable organisation/project. WP:ORG and WP:GNG not met. A search for the subject ('Radharc Archive'), in the newspapers of record in Ireland, returns a single/solitary result. And a search for the org that oversees the subject ('Radharc Trust') just 5 results. This falls significantly short of SIGCOV expectations. Don't see this as a controversial deletion. Hence procedural tag."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guliolopez (talk) 10:38, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of The Radharc Archive for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Radharc Archive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Radharc Archive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guliolopez (talk) 12:29, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Museum end
Template:Museum end has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:10, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pierre Henri Cami


A tag has been placed on Pierre Henri Cami, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MB 21:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Guilherme Rebelo de Andrade


The article Guilherme Rebelo de Andrade has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced for years, and even the sources on the Portuguese Wikipedia don't seem to cover WP:ARCHITECT or show 'significant coverage' per WP:GNG. Have been unable to find a substantial number sources online that would demonstrate 'significant coverage'."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qtaa (talk) 04:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

WikiBooks import
Have you ever considered b:WikiBooks:Requests for import for  User:Emijrp/All_Human_Knowledge?

I think it would be much more useful there because search engines could index your work and more people could actually discover it. Currently, the 30-day view count only indicates 190. I think your work suits WikiBooks more.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.114.106.114 (talk) 15:15, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Update
Nobody updated this page since 2013: List of Wikipedians by number of edits ჯეო 4WIKI Message MeContributions 21:39, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of museums in Gabon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of museums in Gabon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of museums in Gabon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Elliot321 (talk &#124; contribs) 09:32, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of years in Guinea-Bissau


The article List of years in Guinea-Bissau has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "resolutely fails LISTPURP with no navigation potential; overwhelmingly redlinks of which the vast majority would never be viable articles"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 22:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello Emijrp! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  17:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Juan Antonio Cebrián


The article Juan Antonio Cebrián has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Rogermx (talk) 20:35, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Your article National Archives of Benin
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page National Archives of Benin to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 14:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Archives Wiki
Template:Archives Wiki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hog Farm Talk 05:47, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Curro Rivera Agüero for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Curro Rivera Agüero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Curro Rivera Agüero until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:57, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Gabriel Aragón for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabriel Aragón is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gabriel Aragón until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 4meter4 (talk) 19:06, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emilio Bellvis Montesano


The article Emilio Bellvis Montesano has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Quick BEFORE check shows no independent significant sourcing. Sources on the eswiki article (which is awful) appear to be family websites (not independent), an El Mundo magazine article that doesn't mention his name, and a bunch of dead links that can't be assessed. The sole live independent source is from Libertad Digital, and is more about the court case where he was found not to be the inventor of something than about him. It's certainly not enough to hang an article on."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:39, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Juvenal de Araújo


The article Juvenal de Araújo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 19:12, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacques Van Herp


A tag has been placed on Jacques Van Herp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ~ GB fan 12:48, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Margarida de Ávila for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Margarida de Ávila is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Margarida de Ávila until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 20:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

wmcounter
Hello Emijrp, I wonder if you are still maintaining this tool? There is no number shown under the text "Total edits in Wikimedia projects". Thanks.  Stang  23:18, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedians who read Carl Sagan


A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedians who read Carl Sagan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk  07:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Wikilivres
Hi, Wikilivres is not funtional any more. Are there still copies of the site somewhere? IIRC you made some. Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of submerged places in France for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of submerged places in France is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of submerged places in France until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rorshacma (talk) 17:16, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Wmcounter
It looks like the tool doesn't work anymore. Has it moved perhaps? Ainali (talk) 19:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of repositories for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of repositories is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of repositories until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. fgnievinski (talk) 02:32, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lorenzo López Mulero


The article Lorenzo López Mulero has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Based on his es.wiki article (also unsourced) he was only ever the mayor of Oviedo and never held any other NPOL-meeting political positions. I was not able to locate any coverage of him, save the entry in the Biographical Dictionary of Spanish Socialism."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Enrique Munné


The article Enrique Munné has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. Google hits are wikipedia mirrors, no results in my academic library. Brief namechecks in Spanish-language sources. es-wiki article exists but is nearly an orphan and has no inline references."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. asilvering (talk) 18:15, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Enrique Munné for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enrique Munné is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Enrique Munné until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. asilvering (talk) 04:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bertil von Friesen


The article Bertil von Friesen has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced article does not appear to meet GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 09:33, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Stanisław Roman Lewandowski for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stanisław Roman Lewandowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stanisław Roman Lewandowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Réunion (talk!) 17:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of female Egyptologists for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of female Egyptologists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of female Egyptologists& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 16:57, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Shitalang Shah
I just created a Wikipedia article, the name is Shitalang Shah.

But immediately, same article is created in other platform by other author, He has copied ànd paste my content directly from Wikipedia. the link are given below

theyouth.com.pk

Please see this serious matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bpagla (talk • contribs) 21:16, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Antonio Blázquez y Delgado-Aguilera


The article Antonio Blázquez y Delgado-Aguilera has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced stub for for over a decade. No indication of importance."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Pbrks (t • c) 04:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pedro Espinosa Lorenzo


The article Pedro Espinosa Lorenzo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Enrique Lorenzo Docampo


The article Enrique Lorenzo Docampo has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Bio of non notable local politician"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 22:31, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of José Emilio Lunghi


The article José Emilio Lunghi has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable city mayor"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 00:45, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Talk:Violence against men
Talk:Violence against men, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Violence against men and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Violence against men during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Tambor de Tocino (talk) 01:07, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Venancio Antonio Morin


The article Venancio Antonio Morin has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No RIS found; the only source I see is a blog site with no apparent claim of notability and one inaccessible Google book. Es.wiki article deleted as copyvio (not sure of what)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 05:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Venancio Antonio Morin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Venancio Antonio Morin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Venancio Antonio Morin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. BostonMensa (talk) 01:29, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ezio Corlaita


The article Ezio Corlaita has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG, WP:NSPORTS and WP:SIGCOV"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 02:21, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maurice Aubert


The article Maurice Aubert has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: '''Fails notability guidelines for biographies; the French article cites two sources. One of them doesn't even mention Aubert, and the other only establishes him as a member of CIELT in a list of members. It also provides two external links, both of which cites Wikipedia as their sources on information about Aubert. Even the supposedly better French article fails to establish notability; there has been no significant coverage of this person in any reliable source whatsoever.

It appears that at least a handful of academic publications are associated with Aubert, but this is not sufficient to establish notability for academics. WP:NACADEMIC sets out a list of criteria, and there is nothing to indicate he meets any of them. Importantly, there is no coverage of his academic work in any secondary sources.

Note that there is a French marine biologist of the same name who might meet the relevant notability criteria, but they are not the same person.'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Actualcpscm (talk) 09:09, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Maurice Aubert for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maurice Aubert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Maurice Aubert until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Actualcpscm (talk) 17:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Institute of National Studies of Tiaret for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Institute of National Studies of Tiaret is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Institute of National Studies of Tiaret until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JMWt (talk) 09:26, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

"806.4616.0110" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=806.4616.0110&redirect=no 806.4616.0110] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Skarmory  (talk •   contribs)  09:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at  on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk  09:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

"Hiroshima massacre" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hiroshima_massacre&redirect=no Hiroshima massacre] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Loafiewa (talk) 07:17, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Panoramio
Template:Panoramio has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ZandDev (msg) 14:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ralph Soupault


A tag has been placed on Ralph Soupault requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Ben Azura (talk) 22:34, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Víctor Sueiro


A tag has been placed on Víctor Sueiro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ASUKITE 14:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Edwin Daniel moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Edwin Daniel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 11:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edwin Daniel


The article Edwin Daniel has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:ANYBIO / WP:NCREATIVE, lacks any sources or references. Has been tagged as such since March 2013, without any improvements or referencing since then."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 01:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Aidan Bryant
Aidan Bryant was the winner of America's Got Talent: All-Stars and he still doesn't have a wikipedia page. Can you please add this article to Wikidata so the world can find info on this person so that he can finally have a page of his own? He deserves to be known, he's a champion! PowerRanger200 (talk) 03:25, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Lord Milner's Timeline
Thank you!🙂

Nomination of Ramón Mendezona Roldán for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramón Mendezona Roldán is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ramón Mendezona Roldán until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Boleyn (talk) 21:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Manuel París Ricaurte for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manuel París Ricaurte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Manuel París Ricaurte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Allan Nonymous (talk) 04:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of movie theaters for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of movie theaters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of movie theaters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Francisco Contreras Valenzuela
Hello, Emijrp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Francisco Contreras Valenzuela, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 28 June 2024 (UTC)