User talk:Emil a C

Speedy deletion nomination of BuildingLink


A tag has been placed on BuildingLink, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of BuildingLink and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 18:36, 8 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Are there news articles or coverage that discuss the software? We need Independent, Reliable sources to show that the subject is notable. I'm moving the article to your userspace - You'll want to take some time to build the article in a sandbox at User:Emil a C/Buildinglink; in this way, you can take your time and work on making the article Neutral and verifiable before moving it to the BuildingLink article. Please review our policies, and feel free to ask any questions you have using the helpme template. Best, UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 18:55, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at BuildingLink
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
 * Place  on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
 * Make your case on the article's .

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 18:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)