User talk:Emilehiggins

April 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Peter Crouch‎. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tmol42 (talk) 22:18, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Peter Crouch. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. - Rburke&lt;sup&gt;&lt;small&gt;(talk)&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt; (talk) 15:22, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Peter Crouch. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. 5 albert square (talk) 17:52, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism-only account and evasion of block of User:Emilewilliamivanhoeheskey,. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu  18:22, 11 April 2010 (UTC)