User talk:EmiliaAno

July 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Zirid dynasty, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 10:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Zirid dynasty, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 16:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make unexplained changes to information on Wikipedia, as you did at Sack of Naples. -- Avocado (talk) 13:54, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 12:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptively editing while logged out. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:06, 5 July 2023 (UTC)