User talk:Emilieyoungs/sandbox

Dear Emilie, Nice job on your article evaluation. For your two selected articles, they are both very broad, and I saw your note on the difficulty of finding something more specific to build on. Maybe if you can stop by my OH we can find a wikipedia page better suited for and more specific to your area of interest. Keep searching for those stub articles! They're out there! -Momo Sumomox4nouchi (talk) 23:56, 7 February 2019 (UTC)sumomox4nouchi

Wiki check point for this week
Finalize article selections 2/28 - Add an opening section titled "PE org" or "", and state your PE org's name, location, and what you anticipate doing with it. - Be sure the two W. articles (one for area and one sector) that you've selected are adequately highlighted under "Article Selection" along with 2-3 lines each stating why you are picking these articles and what your plan for research/adding/editing is. - Identify and read scholarly sources. Fill out your draft annotations for your sources (summarizing, and stating how you will use this source) under "Scholarly Sources". - Start a new section "Summarizing and Synthesizing" with sub-sections for "Area" and "Sector". Here, begin to summarize and synthesize what you are beginning to learn from your sources. Here, don't tackle each source separately, but synthesize them. Aim to articulate key historical events and relevant public debate you're learning about (this is usually part of your area research, and also part of applying Fraser) and key debates/different approaches (usually part of your sector research) within which or vis-á-vis you might situate your PE org's approach. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumomox4nouchi (talk • contribs) 03:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Maggie's Peer Review
Hi Emilie, I was assigned to peer edit your drafting, but couldn't do so because you didn't have anything up yet. But, I read through some of the rest of your Sandbox and your organization sounds really great! I'm especially interested in seeing what you're able to add to the "school counselor" article as it pertains to California schools. I grew up in LA and recently participated in the LAUSD strikes in January so I know that there has been a lack of counselors for public school students there in the past decade. I think it would be interesting to see how organizations like yours are helping to mitigate that problem. Mag2718 (talk) 05:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Chan's Peer Review
Hi Emilie,

Firstly, I wanna say that I enjoyed learning about your PE org and the discourse surrounding it all. I like that you narrowed down in your area from education to after school activity, because I agree, education is such a broad topic. I also like how you acknowledged the importance of school counselors and identified it as your sector. If you are looking for something more specific, since a lot of counselors have to go through more educational and professional training, I think advising or mentoring might be something to look into. Your research is heading in the right direction though. I am a little confused on your article evaluation, titled "South Los Angeles" because that was not listed under area or sector...I see you have the amount of sources, but it would be great if you could elaborate on them in the summarizing and synthesizing sections. As for drafting, I can't say much either, but it is understandable because research can be tricky. Good job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgao29 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 4 April 2019 (UTC)