User talk:Emilio riga

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Hamilton Italo Canadians Soccer 1970
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hamilton Italo Canadians Soccer 1970, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.canadakicks.com/?p=1033.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:55, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hamilton Italo Canadians Soccer 1970


A tag has been placed on Hamilton Italo Canadians Soccer 1970 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:36, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Don't get yourself fired
I see you wrote this article for the Hamilton Spectator. A seriously doubt the newspaper gave you the legal right to post this article anywhere you feel like. And does this for-profit newspaper publish under a Creative Commons license? If you are writing for pay, you really need a better understanding of copyright law. If the newspaper sees you posting this, I would expect they would never hire you to write an article again. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 15:35, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, Emilio, it is highly unlikely that the newspaper gave you the rights to republish in other places. If your contract said that your writing was "for hire" then you don't even own the copyright to the article, the newspaper does. Even if not, your contract almost certainly stated that you agree not to publish in other locations, and it definitely wouldn't allow you to re-license it under Creative Commons. Since newspapers make there money by their content, they know full well that they no one will buy if that content is freely available elsewhere. If you are absolutely certain that you do have the right to re-publish, you would need to prove it at Volunteer Response Team by submitting the documents. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 15:35, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * That said, I'm not sure if your article is appropriate for our website. First, it's not really written in an encyclopedia's writing style. Second, it probably doesn't meet our notability guidelines - see Notability (sports) and Notability. Since this was a local amateur/semi-pro team that had little national or international matches, it probably doesn't meet the guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 15:35, 21 November 2014 (UTC)