User talk:EmilyEEktown

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello E3a, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Twitter trends have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — — Preceding unsigned comment added by Finncowboy (talk • contribs)

April 2022
Hi E3a! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Machine learning that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Politanvm talk 18:44, 9 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi @Politanvm
 * Thank you very much for your calm explanation. Appreciated. E3a (talk) 18:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, E3a. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Who is Rahimberdi Annamoradnejad [et al.] and why are you adding citations by them across multiple pages? El_C 13:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

'''He answered below. It seems like a mistake on his part. This should not be a simple way to promote and then attack a public figure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Finncowboy (talk • contribs)

Paid editing disclosure
Hello E3a. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:E3a. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. El_C 14:04, 10 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I have no private or public compensation, employer, client or affiliation for my edits. @El C E3a (talk) 14:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)


 * So no connection to Rahimberdi Annamoradnejad whatsoever? Well, aside from creating that page, obviously. El_C 14:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * He has a weekly interview in Channel Mazandaran of our country. He talks about science and how to apply in business. I started to enjoy the show which ended last year. I'm not a research scientist or anything. I thought I was helping him in reverse because he is of my own ethnicity. I did not know I was hurting wikipedia. Sorry for that. @El C E3a (talk) 15:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * That's okay, thanks for explaining. Just try not to repeatedly promote any one individual, through citations or anything, going forward. Regards, El_C 18:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * no connection to Issa Annamoradnejad either? Even if its not paid editing, your edits give the impression of being promotion for this phd student. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.135.169.167 (talk) 20:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Please confirm if you have or not have any affiliation with any of the papers/authors/institutions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Finncowboy (talk • contribs)


 * No connection to anyone or institution. I did not think my actions would reflect on them and be connected to them. Never thought about it like that. E3a

Future edits
To E3A: If you ever want to edit any more pages, please refrain from citing the same article or author multiple times. This may look like you are helping the person, but it may end up hurting. From your answer, I realize that you are not aware of the rules.

To readers: It's very common that authors would use Wikipedia for personal gain. However, this should not become a simple way to destroy a public figure. For example, if A creates an account and cites the papers of B in many places, it will create a discussion about B, aka. victim. I am not seeing that here, but it could happen. The discussion should remain civil, and without assumptions. I edited the page to achieve this goal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Finncowboy (talk • contribs)

A question about your connection to Rahimberdi Annamoradnejad
What exactly is the nature of your connection to Rahimberdi Annamoradnejad? Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline indicates that you should state what the connection is.JBW (talk) 19:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I explained this before and I will not edit or add any content related to science. It was a mistake on my part.
 * He has a weekly interview in Channel Mazandaran of our country. He talks about science and how to apply in business. I started to enjoy the show which ended last year. I'm not a research scientist or anything. I thought I was helping him in reverse because he is of my own ethnicity. I did not know I was hurting wikipedia. Sorry for that. E3a (talk) 19:41, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 * My apologies for asking again after you had already answered. I hadn't seen your previous message about this, which by the time I came here had been removed from the page. JBW (talk) 07:39, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you @JBW E3a (talk) 10:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation pages
A disambiguation page is not a stub, and it should have no articles linking directly to it - so please stop adding stub and orphan to disambiguation pages like this, as it just wastes other editors' time cleaning up after you. Thanks. Pam D  20:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Understood. Thank you for explaining. E3a (talk) 20:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Minor edits
Please stop marking all your edits as "minor": this only applies to things like " ... typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, and reversion of obvious vandalism.", and not to tagging articles and similar changes. Thanks. Pam D  20:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry @PamD
 * I'm just starting to become active and be productive. I will not do this again. E3a (talk) 20:51, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 * See Help:Minor_edit for some guidance. Pam  D  20:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you E3a (talk) 20:53, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Tic Tac Toy
Hello, I see you edited this with the edit summary "clean up." Unfortunately, you only removed the tag without making it less an advertisement. Thanks, -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 16:13, 15 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * What was the reason for advertisement about that page? It seemed to be about a youtube page with half million subscribers. E3a (talk) 18:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Indefinite block
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia for promotion or advertising purposes: false WP:COI disclosure RE: Rahimberdi Annamoradnejad. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 21:03, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rahimberdi Annamoradnejad
Hello, EmilyEEktown. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rahimberdi Annamoradnejad, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rahimberdi Annamoradnejad


Hello, EmilyEEktown. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rahimberdi Annamoradnejad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:57, 16 October 2022 (UTC)