User talk:EmilyFreg19/sandbox

Hi Emily, I see you have put in a decent amount of research so far into how your article relates to your PE and the facts surrounding that. As for your complete evaluation of your article, make sure to include not just an evaluation of the content, but also your findings on the article's tone, sources, and talk page. Check our your peer, Nick Allen's, or my wikipedia page for an example outline of this. Keep up the good work! -Momo Sumomox4nouchi (talk) 23:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)sumomox4nouchi

Peer Review
Looking at the lead of the sandbox by itself, I think the section “PE Org” can be moved to the very top of the article. Once that is done, the lead will reflect important information and set the tone for the rest of the sandbox.

There are 3+3 scholarly sources and annotations for both the area and sector article, but try looking for more and add them to your sandbox. The annotations are thoughtful and clearly describe how you plan to use the source.

The sections are organization well but missing information in the “Summarizing and Synthesizing” and “Drafting”. Think about how you planned you use your sources in the beginning bibliography and start drafting specific sentences to add to your articles. For Summarizing and Synthesizing, think about how your sources talk to each other.

The Purepecha article only has three sections, two of them very short. Each section’s length doesn’t equal to its importance so look for adding information to the Language and Religion sections. It looks like there are only two references, so only two perspectives are integrated in the article. Think about how your sources and contributions to the article can broaden the range of perspectives in the article; this will make the article more balanced.

Jasleenkaur118 (talk) 16:37, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Jasleen Kaur

Nick's Peer Review
Hi Emily,

I'm going to hold off on reviewing your work for now since you haven't yet gotten around to "Summarizing and Synthesizing" and "Drafting." It looks like your scholarly sources are in good shape and I'm looking forward to seeing what you make out of them! Please let me know when you have some potential contributions here and I'd be happy to give my thoughts.

- Nick Nickallen7 (talk) 01:10, 5 April 2019 (UTC)