User talk:Emilyjnichols2/sandbox

Positive: A good subject of focus. A good area to work with and expand on further. Solid information and clear underlining of subtitles and structure with your article. Really quality start and shows your interest in the subject by your work.

Criticism: I want to learn more about Lucinda Chambers. You have covered her background story and information very well. I have read about her personally but I want to know why she links to you and your subject. Clear title to start with.

There's not a lot there.

Why does she link to digital citizenship?

How does Lucinda Chamber use Technology?

Does she use technology?

In further depth why is she so admirable?

Evaluation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samchaffe (talk • contribs) 10:06, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

You have written some interesting bits about Lucinda, you make comments like, "her bold style..." it would be great to refer the reader to either a brief explanation of why her style is bold or maybe some external link that shows her boldness. There are different students writing about Lucinda, me and Martin have come to the conclusion that Rowen Ellis (rowenellis username) is a sound basis to work collaboratively. By this, we mean that you find in your material elements/information that would enhance Rowen's biography. Please be aware of referencing properly your contribution. Thank you for the work and well done for the attempt. --CKuhnH (talk) 11:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)