User talk:Emilyle53/sandbox

Article Evaluation: Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic. This article is mostly neutral because it gives both sides of the controversy, but their are more points leading to why child beauty pageants could possibly damage kids. The point that is underrepresented is the defendants side, the side who believes child beauty pageants are just an activity. They only got one paragraph, whereas the other side had many of their points represented. All the links I checked worked, but the second link I checked did not seem to be relevant to the topic. Majority of the links were relevant to the topic and support the claims in the article. Some of the sources are reliable, the ones that are not because they are not neutral due to the fact that they are news articles. The articles that are biased are not listed s biased, but there are more biased articles than there are neutral. The citations are not out of date and all the facts are listed, there is nothing missing, the only thing I would add is examples of actual pageant competitors.There is not much talk going on, besides the adding of citations and adding how France banned child beauty pageants. This article has yet to be rated. This is part of the wiki project "Beauty Pageants". It is different in the way that it goes much more into detail about each point, but it is not as neutral as our pieces.