User talk:Emilyloisel/sandbox

Article Evaluation
I felt like "Digital Divide" and "Digital Divide in Canada" were pretty straight forward articles, and nothing really distracted me from the topics. I didn't find that there was a fixed opinion in either of them, and they seemed to be factual. The authors hit a lot of subtopics in "Digital Divide" and "Digital Divide in Canada," though "Digital Divide in Canada" focused more on areas within Canada. I think the authors did a good job in explaining what they were talking about without under-representing anything. I tested out a few of the links, and they seemed to do their job well. I checked out the link "Community Informatics," and it supported the authors claims. The authors use a lot of different sources which makes me think they do a lot of research on the subjects. None of the sources I viewed seemed sketchy or non-reliable. A lot of the sources are up to date, but I did notice a couple were pretty old (from 2003 and 2011). On the Talk Page, someone mentioned that "Digital Divide" should be merged with another relevant article. I would say these articles should have a pretty high rating due to their quality. I'm not sure if they are a part of any WikiProjects. In LIS 2000, we have talked a lot about the timeline of information and its resources; whereas, "Digital Divide" and "Digital Divide in Canada" focus more on who has more access to information and how to expand it.