User talk:Emilymadams/sandbox

Article Evaluation
I looked at the article titled "Women in Medicine." The article stays on topic and is split up into a few sections, but I felt overall that there has to be so much more that could go on a page with such a broad category. Everything in the article was related to the topic and seemingly unbiased, but many areas felt unexplored or glossed over. The most over represented viewpoint would have to be the excessive focus on American doctors and history. There is some focus on Medieval Europe and a brief section on the history of Chinese medicine, but overall the focus is heavily American, and this is noted in the Talk section of the page where contributors were looking for more emphasis on non-western views of the history of women in medicine. Some of the links I tried also did not work, but it seemed to be issues with the sources rearranging websites and the like. The article is rated with a class C and is of interest to multiple WikiProjects involving medicine, women's history, etc. Emilymadams (talk) 03:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)