User talk:Emilymedison

August 2022
Hello, I'm Ferret. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add or restore sources that are removed as unreliable. -- ferret (talk) 14:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, Ferret.
 * I added the source today and you had removed the source link. How can you say that it was not a reliable source. You have no right to change the source, as the source is reliable and information in the source is up to date and reliable. Emilymedison (talk) 14:59, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Sources on Wikipedia must be reliable according to our guidelines, WP:RS. This site is not, and I replaced it with another source that is unquestionably reliable and vetted by our community. Are you spamming this site? I see most of your edits are to unnecessarily add this site. -- ferret (talk) 15:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The site is also reliable not a spamy one. You better add your source along with the one added earlier by me. Emilymedison (talk) 15:08, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II (2022 video game). Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Please do not continue to add unreliable sources once informed that they are not suitable for Wikipedia. -- ferret (talk) 15:16, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- ferret (talk) 15:34, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Little Alchemy 2


A tag has been placed on Little Alchemy 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:41, 27 August 2022 (UTC)