User talk:Emilyngu3/Mighty-O Donuts

Peer Review From Anjali
Hi! Great start! Here is the link to your peer review: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emilyngu3/Mighty-O_Donuts/Anjsan01_Peer_Review Anjsan01 (talk) 23:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I peer reviewed your article! Fuller2019 (talk) 03:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC).

Preliminary Review from Kaylea
Hi, I'm starting to walk through articles and give everyone informal early feedback on how they're doing. You'll notice this is a little bit form-letter-ish but I hope it is still helpful!

I see you've made some changes and are starting to incorporate elements from our training, but there's still a ways to go with this article. If you're feeling stuck, please let me know how I can support you.

To help you stay on track, you should look at an existing article on a similar topic to see what sections are included and some additional sources you could pull from.

Kaylea Champion (talk) 07:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hi I have peer reviewed your article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emilyngu3/Mighty-O_Donuts/Carlematsu_Peer_Review?venotify=created Here is a link to it! Carlematsu (talk) 07:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I peer-reviewed your article. Here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emilyngu3/Mighty-O_Donuts/Kfoltz2_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review Kfoltz2 (talk) 05:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

feedback on progress
Hi

You're definitely making progress on this article, but I think it will need revision in terms of tone, in particular the lead; unfortunately right now it sounds a bit too promotional -- just being blunt right now because I know everyone is trying to finish.

This part in particular seems promotional: "Their values encompass being truthful, innovative, respectful of individuals, communities, and cultures, and respecting nature and the environment."

This bit might be taken as a little too trivial: "Mighty-O uses only sustainable, recyclable or compostable packaging for its items."

And this bit is a little too vague I think: "The company has been recognized by many publications for various achievements.".

You might also see that the main article has recently had its notability questioned -- to the extent that it's notable, these are the criteria: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) -- details that would help to resolve the question of notability would be particularly welcomed I think.

Awards and honors are often included in a page like this; if there are more, definitely add them.

Some of the new content lacks citations -- I think you have the sources, but need to add the cites?

Good luck and keep going!

Kaylea Champion (talk) 02:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Go Live Approval
Hi

You are approved to go live with this article.

As a reminder, here are our go-live steps:


 * 1) Final read-through draft.
 * 2) Check live article for changes. [History Tab]
 * 3) Two browsers side by side, if you can. Source editing mode ("Code mode"), not visual editor.
 * 4) Paragraph by paragraph copy, leaving behind an explanatory edit summary after each chunk of changes.
 * 5) Note on article talk page.
 * 6) Note at the top of your sandbox version.
 * 7) Submit a link to your article on Canvas.
 * 8) Celebrate!

Kaylea Champion (talk) 06:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC)