User talk:EmilyvstheGorn

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hannah Hanson Kinney has been accepted
 Hannah Hanson Kinney, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! gobonobo + c 11:15, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:EmilyvstheGorn help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi EmilyvstheGorn! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:23, Wednesday, June 24, 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi EmilyvstheGorn! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:26, Wednesday, June 24, 2015 (UTC)

Emily C. Gorman
Saw your message on the article. Enjoyed learning about her. Good to see someone working on women's articles. I am still fairly new here, been editing under a year, but I write a lot of articles. Mainly because I have had great mentors, I stay interested. Find a Grave is not generally considered a reliable source External links/Perennial websites (I only know this because someone hammered me on it). You should be able to find a photo of her to upload. Government made photos can be uploaded to commons. If one is not identified as made by the government, you can still upload it using a fair use rationale. I can help you a little bit, if you need help, but photos and their copyrights are complicated. I am no expert, but I have not had one of my fair use photos challenged. You should nominate her for DYK. She is certainly deserving of wider recognition. Ping me if you want input or help and I'll try. SusunW (talk) 22:16, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey SusunW, thanks so much for replying so quickly! She is interesting, isn't she? Thanks for pointing out that Find a Grave isn't a great source; I'll be searching for replacements today. I am having some trouble finding a government issued photo of her, although I saw quite a few black and white photos in old newspapers and books. I realize that's not the right idea. I didn't know what DYK was, so I've looked into it per your suggestion and will try to get the article ready to submit! Thanks again, you're awesome. EmilyvstheGorn (talk) 13:21, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I wish I knew an easier way for photos. I don't. I can rarely find anything on commons. Basically, I just snip a photo and fill out the fair use with rationale that they are deceased and the photo will not harm anyone's use. look at this one for the rationale I used. [File:Esther Seligson.jpg] If you need help with the DYK nomination, holler. You don't have to review another file for your first 5 nominations so just put in that line that it is your first nomination. SusunW (talk) 14:41, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi User:EmilyvstheGorn and User:SusunW: I found two public domain photos of Emily C. Gorman from: 1. https://books.google.com/books?id=G1NrzaxzRN4C&pg=PA188 2. https://books.google.com/books?id=G1NrzaxzRN4C&pg=PA190 I have added them to the article after uploading them to Commons. I've also reviewed the DYK nomination and left a comment about the sourcing at Template:Did you know nominations/Emily C. Gorman. When you get a chance, please take a look. Thanks! Cunard (talk) 01:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Wow, thanks so much, Cunard! The photos are great. I've clarified the correct page number for the citation. I'll leave a note on the template too. Thanks again!! EmilyvstheGorn (talk) 01:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the quick fix, Emily! I've verified the nomination, so it's now ready for DYK. Regarding citing sources, it looks like multiple pages of Bettie J. Morden's book The Women's Army Corps, 1945-1978 are being cited in the article. As a suggestion, maybe you might want to follow the structure Citing sources? This will allow you to cite multiple page numbers, like:Morden, p. 187Morden, p. 197 I enjoyed reading your article about Emily C. Gorman. Thank you for your excellent work! Best, Cunard (talk) 01:25, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Emily C. Gorman
Hello! Your submission of Emily C. Gorman at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 10:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sherri Gallagher has been accepted
 Sherri Gallagher, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Sulfurboy (talk) 18:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Sherri_Gallagher help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Pangelinan has been accepted
 Susan Pangelinan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Sulfurboy (talk) 19:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Susan_Pangelinan help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Nomination of Susan Pangelinan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susan Pangelinan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Susan Pangelinan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Emily C. Gorman
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:17, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Virginia A. Houston
Glad to see you're still hanging in here. I don't find much about her and apparently, not much is known. In later life lived in Cleveland The Crisis good luck. If I can help in any way, ping me. You might be interested in checking out redlinked files on women WikiProject Women in Red. SusunW (talk) 02:27, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=677845308 your edit] to Slasher film may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Also in 1960, British director Michael Powell released Peeping Tom, which featured a young photographer (Carl Boëhm) murdering young

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slasher film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Five minutes to help make WikiProjects better
Hello!

First, on behalf of WikiProject X, thank you for trying out the WikiProject X pilot projects. I would like to get some anonymous feedback from you on your experience using the new WikiProject layout and tools. This way, we will know what we did right, and if we did something horribly wrong, we can try to fix it. This feedback won't be associated with your username, so please be completely honest. We are determined to improve the experience of Wikipedians, and your feedback helps us with that. (You are also welcome to leave non-anonymous feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject X.)

Please complete the survey here. The survey has two parts: the first part asks for your username, while the second part contains the survey questions. These two parts are stored separately, so your username will not be associated with your feedback. There are only nine questions and it should not take very long to complete. Once you complete the survey I will leave a handwritten note on your talk page as a token of my appreciation.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Harej (talk) 17:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello! Just sending a reminder to complete the survey linked above. (This is the only reminder I'll send, I promise.) Let me know on my talk page if you have any questions. Thank you!!! Harej (talk) 22:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Sandi Peterson
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:22, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for participating


Thank you for your interest in Women in Red and for your participation in the virtual Women in Leadership Edit-a-thon, 7-20 September 2015. It was a resounding success with over 160 new articles. Your contributions are appreciated! We'll keep you posted on future events. --Ipigott (talk) 09:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

= You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture==

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Julia Fahl for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julia Fahl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Julia Fahl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 01:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you reside in the United States)
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 16:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC)