User talk:Emir234

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 18:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

July 2014
Hello, I'm Joy. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Abortion in Croatia. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

An anonymous editor had tried to remove this content from the exact same paragraph of the article before. Removing context and information from the exact same secondary source that we cite - is easily seen as cherry-picking. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 17:59, 22 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I removed that part because I think it is irrelevant for the article. The article is about abortion in Croatia and the section is about public opinion on ABORTION (not sexual abstinence, Church opinions and so on). To talk about those issues in that section is too extensive and out of topic. --Emir234 (talk) 19:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)


 * So why didn't you remove everything else about Church opinions, then? If the opinion of a bishop is relevant to the article, sourced to newspaper articles, then it cannot possibly be said that the conclusions of scholars doing polling about the issue is irrelevant. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 11:44, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Croatia religion
Hey Emir234, could you briefly explain how you come to the number of 24% you edited in the religion section of Croatia? i couldnt find it in the source.--Joobo (talk) 08:32, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Page 118 in the source. 20% said they attend once a week, and 4% more than once a week. --Emir234 (talk) 16:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC)