User talk:Emirgan1980

Your recent edits
Kermanshahi's source it is no:14 PRO-PKK web site (The PKK is listed as a terrorist organization internationally) that source says "kurds 25 million in Turkey" ... ASK: We can add every source ????)

All sirius searches say that kurds in Turkey between 11.4 - 14 million %15-%18 census sources and CIA factbook and other university researches.

we must add these sources not PRO-PKK sites or political propoganda materials.

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.

some user add PRO-PKK (Terrorist organisation) web site as source... I ask you that qouestiın it s so easyh, can I add AL-QAIDA sources on Afganistan War ? AL-QAIDA says that we killed 10.000 american soldiers ... if some one add pro-pkk not objettive sources everybody can add all terrorist site sources

--SineBot (talk) 10:52, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Western Asia, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 08:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Kurdish people
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Omar-Toons (talk) 21:14, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Kurdish people
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Boolyme   Chat!! 21:40, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
 * 3) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

February 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kurdish people, you may be blocked from editing. ''Discuss on talk page. In case of references saying different things, its better to remove the section itself.''  Boolyme   Chat!! 11:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Egypt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Egypt, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:18, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Egypt, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:58, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Egypt, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Careful
Do not use your own peculiar definitions of "vandalism." Use talkpages. Stay civil. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:31, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

On the other hand, this edit of yours is vandalism. The dab-headers are there for a reason, as are the other templates. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:35, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Warning against personal attacks
You will receive one warning from me regarding your statement, Kansas Bear's anti-Turk propaganda.... Another personal attack from you will result in the notification of an Admin. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)