User talk:Emkay202

June 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Saab Group, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Spartacus! (talk) 04:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Why are my edits considered disruptive?
Why are my edits considered disruptive? I didn't delete anything; I just moved text around to make the article more cohesive. Right now, there is a lot of repetitive information on Saab Group's page. I was trying to make it flow better. Why is that a bad thing? (I did actually delete a paragraph concerning the business area "Security and Defence Solutions" because according to their website, that is no longer a business area within Saab Group.) Emkay202 (talk) 06:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Ok I didn't noticed your last edit summary but your changes deleted over 1000 bytes of well sourced information. Spartacus! (talk) 06:19, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

But I deleted the information and then moved it to a different part of the page. I didn't delete it completely (except for the parts about Business Area Defence and Security Solutions, because that Business Area is no longer active ). I also tried to correct the information about Saab Barracuda LLC. It's listed with the Business Areas, but it is not a Business Area. It is a subsidiary of Saab Defense and Security USA. Emkay202 (talk) 06:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * You both are new to Wikipedia in 2016. The best way to handle this particular issue is to discuss the specific edits on the article's talk page. Emkay, don't worry - you haven't been sanctioned or anything like that. These kinds of disagreements happen all the time, and the article talk page exists to work these things out.  I think you both have acted in good faith and have the article's best wording in mind.  It's just a matter of working out your differences on the talk page. It can all be resolved if you take the time to discuss the specifics.  Good luck. — Maile  (talk) 00:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)