User talk:EmmSeeMusic

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Two and a Half Men. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. AmiDaniel (talk) 05:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Google toolbar issue, cutoff half the submitted edit form. Accident obviously.  Wikipedia states the error in the editor, too.  Hopefully firefox/google toolbar fix this soon.  --EmmSeeMusic 18:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: Sorry --- I understand
No problem, glad you have understood. I recommend you not to delete posts made in your talk page, as if repeated is considered vandalism. If you have any doubt about Wikipedia guidelines, style guides or policies, or you need help, just drop a note in my talk page. Hope to see you expanding articles! -- ReyBrujo 06:17, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Forum links
The forums I have removed are completely unencyclopedic per WP:WEB and WP:EL guidelines. "Blogs, social networking sites (such as MySpace) and forums should generally not be linked to. However, there are exceptions, such as in cases where the article is about, or closely related to, the website itself, or where the website is of a particularly high standard." The forums in question are so small as to not meet that high standard, and so fail to meet our inclusion standards. Wikipedia is not a place to promote your Web sites. If you persist, the Web sites in question may be added to Wikipedia's spam blacklist, which will prevent the links from showing up, no matter how many times you revert them. FCYTravis 10:26, 9 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Your personal attacks against my websites are what is in question. If you had removed all fan sites per WP:WEB and WP:EL guidelines I would have had no problems. You are an administrator here @ Wikipedia, it was disgusting to see such biased actions from someone in your position.  --EmmSeeMusic 08:40, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Legit edit
It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Joey (TV series). Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Lordkinbote 18:38, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I reverted a bunch of content that was added by a user that has been warned and blocked several times. The mass edit was correct.  --EmmSeeMusic 18:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

WP:WEB
You keep removing external links from pages referring to WP:WEB. Please note that that page contains guidelines for articles in Wikipedia about websites. It does not contain guidelines about when external links should or should not be added.

While I agree that probably most (if not all) of the links you have removed should not be mentioned on the various article pages, the reference to WP:WEB is wrong. Notability guidelines about links to external sites can be found at WP:EL. Dagnabit 10:59, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Hey.
Sorry I didn't notice your problem immediately, I was editting. I created a template to help raise awareness, just add NFS to the talk page of the articles in question. I don't know if you know how to work templates, but to add the the name of the article do this -

Add this to the top of the talk page, it should cut down on problems. Cheers, H ig hway Batman! 11:03, 14 July 2006 (UTC)


 * You can also add -


 * To the top of the section, to ward off some fan sites too. Cheers, H ig hway Batman! 11:05, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Friends talk page
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Friends. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Enano275 19:39, 14 July 2006 (UTC)


 * That is a google toolbar issue, it even explains the problem in the Editing page... sorry about that, I should have looked at the page after I saved it to see that the text was removed. Obviously I wasn't looking to destroy the page, I'm always trying to keep the Friends wiki up to par. --EmmSeeMusic 20:14, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Dan Rather
Maybe if you actually explained how WP:EL prohibits this link instead of just saying READ IT, I might understand where you are coming from. Gamaliel 17:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

''' Also from WP:EL .. one of the first things to consider when adding a link: "Is it proper (useful, tasteful, etc.)?" Rotten.com is not a tasteful website, that can not be disputed. I like the site, but his short Rotten bio has no place on his Wiki page. --EmmSeeMusic 17:12, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * from WP:EL - Links normally to be avoided: '''In general, any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article here would have once it becomes an example of brilliant prose.


 * Well, I find it a useful and unique resource. We obviously disagree with the application of WP:EL in this case. Gamaliel 17:13, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with you on it being a useful and unique resource for some topics, but it's not tasteful. --EmmSeeMusic 17:15, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


 * So? Does that automatically disqualify it from WP use? And the site as a whole, no, it is not tasteful, but I don't find anything particularly repellant about the Rather bio page, no autopsy photos, etc. Gamaliel 17:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Striking your vote
Hello EmmSeeMusic,

Thank you for your interest in the Wikimedia Board Election. The Election Committee regretfully informs you that your previous vote was received in error and will be struck according to the election rules, described below.

The Election Committee regretfully announces today that we will have to remove approximately 220 votes submitted. These votes were cast by people not entitled to vote. The election rules state that users must have at least 400 edits by June 1 to be eligible to vote.

The voter lists we sent to Software in the Public Interest (our third party election partner) initially were wrong, and one of your account was eventually included to our initial list. There was a bug in the edit counting program and the sent list contained every account with 201 or more edits, instead of 400 or more edits. So large numbers of people were qualified according to the software who shouldn't be. The bug has been fixed and an amended list was sent to SPI already.

Our first (and wrong) list contains 80,458 accounts as qualified. The proper number of qualified voters in the SPI list is now 52,750. As of the morning of July 4 (UTC), there are 2,773 unique voters and 220 people, including you, have voted who are not qualified based upon this identified error.

In accordance with voting regulations the Election Committee will strike those approximately 220 votes due to lack of voting eligibility. The list of struck votes is available at https://wikimedia.spi-inc.org/index.php/List_of_struck_votes.

We are aware of the possibility that some of the people affected may have other accounts with more than 400 edits, and hence may still be eligible to vote. We encourage you to consider voting again from another account, if you have one. If you have no other account eligible to vote, we hope you reach the criteria in the next Election, and expect to see your participation to the future Elections.

Your comments, questions or messages to the Committee would be appreciated, you can make them at m:Talk:Board elections/2007/en. Other language versions are available at Translation requests/Eleccom mail, 07-05.

Again, we would like to deeply apologize for any inconvenience.

Sincerely, Kizu Naoko Philippe

Jon Harald Søby

Newyorkbrad Tim Starling

For Wikimedia Board Election Steering Committee

Conflict of interest noticeboard
You have been mentioned at COIN. BlueAzure (talk) 03:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. BlueAzure (talk) 03:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * --Ronz (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * --Ronz (talk) 18:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ronz (talk) 17:47, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of EverQuote


A tag has been placed on EverQuote, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 21:45, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at EverQuote, you may be blocked from editing. Largoplazo (talk) 21:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EverQuote Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:EverQuote Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 24 September 2016 (UTC)