User talk:Emma.show

Welcome!
Hi, Emma.show. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place   on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Way 2 veers 03:06, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Blu-ray player software
Your removal of two comments by other editors from Talk:Blu-ray player software was completely unacceptable. If you continue such behavior you may find yourself indefinitely blocked from editing. Please listen to the concerns of other editors and work with them to fix the problems with the article. If you don't, the article in its current form may prove to have a rather limited life-span. Pol430  talk to me  18:57, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Your reverts
Hello. Please refrain from undoing other people's edits without discussing it first. The consensus has already been reached on the talk page and through editing. When everyone else wants to change the article into a redirect and you are the only one who keeps reverting it, without any explanation, then you are edit warring against consensus and that's not acceptable on Wikipedia. If you want to persuade others that the article should stay, please discuss it on the talk page first, do not keep reverting the edits without any explanation. Thank you.&mdash;J. M. (talk) 08:48, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Pol430  talk to me  17:05, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Removed the rest of your Blu-ray section
I removed the rest of your Blu-ray section because it was unreferenced and covered elsewhere anyway. There is a link in "See also" now to a list of software Blu-ray players like PowerDVD, which I believe is what you actually wanted. Some phrases made very little sense. For example, "Blu-ray player software can read Blu-ray disc information directly from the source disc and then play the Blu-ray movie". Well, what else is it supposed to do? And what does "directly" mean? Surely there is some kind of buffering. Why did you put it in the "standards" section? The software is not a standard, is is the implementation of multiple standards, which are covered in the article. --Ysangkok (talk) 09:46, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tarion(Backpack Brand)


A tag has been placed on Tarion(Backpack Brand), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Captain Calm (talk) 09:37, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
 Tarion(Backpack Brand) has been deleted

Hello, Emma.show. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but Tarion(Backpack Brand) has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Identifying blatant advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Deepfriedokra/promo. These are just rough guides. Pages can avoid all those pitfalls and still be glaringly obvious ad copy. Sometimes pages meeting WP:CSD give the appearance of an editor violating Conflict of interest or WP:PAID. Please read and heed them if they apply to you. Please read FAQ/Organizations.

There is a very common mistake of assuming that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to promotion for commercial gain, but that is not so. Sometimes creators of promotional content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write or spent some time writing corporate documents or mission/vision statements or anything similar, they may simply be blind to the promotionality. It can be hard to unlearn.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are  unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. '''That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. ''' Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources. Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 09:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)