User talk:Emma44

Regarding message
Regarding the talk page of the article, please direct comments not directly related to content to my talk page. I think that it was previously deleted, and then recreated. It should be fine, don't worry, just add more content. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 08:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


 * As the article is now, it needs major expansion. Expanding it and adding references would help.  I added stub and an unreferenced tag as an reminder.  Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 08:55, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

ECG
Can't you see my message on the article's talk page? Dekisugi (talk) 11:27, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for the barnstar, it was very kind of you! Don't worry about the deletion. My suggestion is just to go look throughout the articles about article deletion (like Deletion policy). Those can help you write a good article. Another suggestion would be to make a sandbox in your username space (see my sandbox for an example) and then create a 'roughdraft' of your article and bring it up to scratch. After it is of a good quality, create it in the article namespace. Just suggestions for the future. If you have any other questions ask at my talk page. Happy editing - Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 02:21, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay, looks like an alright solution. Just remember the warnings about social networking, though.  I would love to see a draft of the article (please get it up soon) and I can help with layout of the page or anything else you need.  Also let Kushan I.A.K.J have time to consider adminship (it's a tough job!).  Thanks!  Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 08:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh, it looks like the Eagle Club Group's account has been blocked for username violation...Maybe a better idea would have been to create a subpage like User:Emma44/Eagle Club Group, which is what I suggested above (unless you interperated it differently, in which case I'm very sorry). You can either create the subpage and request deletion of the other page or request name change of the Eagle Club Group account.  Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 08:43, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

I have one at the top of my userpage (a box) but I forget to change it sometimes. If Kushan I.A.K.J doesn't want to be an admin, let him be, I guess. He has only been editing for a month and with only 80 edits (as seen here) so his RfA might not be accepted, unfortunately. I normally don't take part in RfA's because that takes alot of experience with other users, of which I lack. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 10:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Eagle Club Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Arx Fortis (talk) 07:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Stop
I'm going to kindly ask you to stop adding the "Eagle Club Group" article back to Wikipedia. The article simply does not meet Wikipedia guidelines for notability. Your activity, including the removal of Speedy Deletion tags and removal of discussion from the article's talk page is considered vandalism. Administrative action may be taken against all of your accounts and may result in further banning from Wikipedia. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 08:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I think maybe since you have been warned you should probably stop re-creating the page... Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 05:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Although, you shouldn't be discouraged from contributing to other articles. Midorihana(talk)(contribs) 07:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Hello?
Hi Emma44, I just logged in quickly before going to bed and saw your message. Sorry I won't be available till tomorrow morning. --Fir0002 11:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC) PS - I also had a quick look on WP:FPC and say your nom - very flattering but I'm not sure it has much chance! :)

Speedy deletion of Fir0002
A tag has been placed on Fir0002 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Menti  fisto  16:16, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Collaborative voting
Collaborative voting and actions, such as you did to "Eagle Club Group and is known as meat puppetry on wiki. This is a violation of WP:SOCK. You will get blocked the next time you do this or recreate an article. Abide by wiki policies and vote soundly, not just because someone is your buddy. —  Rlevse  •  Talk  • 14:36, 8 December 2007 (UTC)