User talk:Emma7231

November 2017
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Internet fax. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 12:44, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of FAX.PLUS


A tag has been placed on FAX.PLUS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Largoplazo (talk) 15:15, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to FAX.PLUS. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 15:15, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   15:23, 14 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Those articles have problems and should be edited or deleted accordingly. I'm going to review them. See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The article you created was an ad through and through. In addition, it lacked any indication that the business might be of encyclopedic significance. Further, the block is about that as well as your ongoing use of Wikipedia to link to their website. Largoplazo (talk) 15:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello, I know this is frustrating, but I cannot see unblocking you unless you affirm that you will not edit about Faxplus or link to Faxplus on other pages. If you have not done so, you should probably read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. My impression is that you need to follow the instructions at WP:PAID. You should probably find some other subject among Wikipedia's 5 million articles to edit about/ Please see WP:Community portal for lists of articles in need of attention. Any other admin can unblock as they see fit, but this is how I see it.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 16:26, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * For the record, I've submitted two of the three articles mentioned for deletion discussions, and cleaned out the third, based on promotional content, mostly associated with conflicts of interest, and existence of applicable sources. Largoplazo (talk) 19:02, 14 October 2018 (UTC)