User talk:EmmaCoop/Archive 1

Fair use rationale for File:Edge 2010.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Edge 2010.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nyttend (talk) 02:58, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Non Free Images in your User Space
Hey there ZZero4K, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:ZZero4K. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of images removed today here


 * Shut off the bot here


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 02:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:John Cena 2008.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:John Cena 2008.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Allan Perley
Please note that all articles on Wikipedia must be either properly categorized or tagged with uncat so that somebody who knows how to categorize articles can look after it. If you want the tag off the article so badly, you can find and add the appropriate categories — but until the page actually has one or more correct categories on it, the tag must stay on the article and will be readded no matter how many times you try to remove it. Categorization is not optional, nor is it something that you get to make your own special rules about on "your" article. Bearcat (talk) 22:58, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * There's no rush or anything to get it done right away. Just as long as the tag stays on the article until you or someone else does get around to it. Bearcat (talk) 23:19, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Just a friendly word to let you know that Wales and England are separate countries. I made the changes to your article. I look forward to seeing reliable sources added to it in the near future. Best, Daicaregos (talk) 20:52, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:26, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there ZZero4K, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:ZZero4K/Pictures.


 * See a log of files removed today here.
 * Shut off the bot here.
 * Report errors here.
 * If you have any questions, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:05, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Allan Perley


The article Allan Perley has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not the place for genealogical entries. Biography articles should only be for people with some sort of fame, achievement, or perhaps notoriety. Sources provided are self-published genealogical records.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cind.  amuse  (Cindy) 10:21, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Don't knock it until you try it for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don't knock it until you try it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Don't knock it until you try it until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cind.  amuse  (Cindy) 10:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Never-Activated
Template:Never-Activated has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jasper Deng (talk) 23:03, 25 August 2011 (UTC)