User talk:Emma wagner21

Welcome!
Hello, Emma wagner21, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:34, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Paleo diet
Hi emma.

You've probably realised by now that I removed your edit on the Paleo diet article, and the edit summary I left as a reason just said "primary source" I just now noticed that you are new here, and may not realise what this means, so I thought I would leave you this link, WP:PRIMARY to a wikipedia policy page that hopefully will explain my reason. This sort of thing can be frustrating to new editors, so please don't give up on us!! Best, -Roxy, the dog. barcus 00:10, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

NS1150 article feedback
Hi Emma wagner21,

Based on the information you provided to support your article choice I will go ahead and assign you to edit the article on "Sports nutrition". I also see you attempted to edit an article already and good for you! The feedback left by the Wikipedia editor on your talk page related to the edit of paleo diet is very important. There are a lot of primary research articles out there that seem to disprove each other, which is why on Wikipedia an resource has to have a general consensus of belief before it gets added to an article. Please refer to our library guides on finding the most reliable and credible information, in addition to referencing the tutorial for editing medical related articles. Feel free to ask me any questions! Saguaromelee (talk) 16:12, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Emma wagner21/sandboxannotatedbib


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Emma wagner21/sandboxannotatedbib. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Sports nutrition. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Sports nutrition. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. –Ammarpad (talk) 02:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Moved page Emma wagner21/sandboxannotatedbib to User:Emma wagner21/sandboxannotatedbib without leaving a redirect: Moving out of mainspace to sandbox
Howdy, I moved the article into your own sandbox, the lack of a User: at the front meant it was a page within the mainspace that everyone can see. Let me know if you have any further questions —   IVORK  Discuss 02:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Feedback for annotated bibliography
Hello! You've done some good initial research, however I'd like to see a few scholarly research articles in your annotated bibliography identified through searching databases like PubMed. You should then focus on analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of those studies to inform your summary on the pros and cons of beverage consumption before and after a workout. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask. Saguaromelee (talk) 19:25, 11 April 2018 (UTC)