User talk:Emmaaitelli/Dime Store Cowgirl

Peer Review- Emmaaitelli https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emmaaitelli/Dime_Store_Cowgirl

Lead The lead section does a good job at concisely describing the content of your article. You mention the songwriters and producers Luke Laird and Shane McAnally, maybe you could follow up on their input on aspects of the song in a separate section of your article. I would also consider mentioning the billboard chart ranking and the critical reception since you do mention the song's nomination. You could also consider emitting the mention of the nomination from the lead.

Content The author added content in the lyrical interpretation section and created the section about the title of the song. It is relevant and up to date. I looked at a couple of other Wikipedia articles about Kacey Musgraves' songs (Space Cowboy and High Horse) and a few sections you could consider adding are critical reception (including quotes from reviews of this song) as well as live performances.

Tone and balance I think that the tone fits with the Wikipedia standard for the majority of the article, in the title of the song there are a couple of sentences that sound a bit informal. They include good content but could probably just be worded to sound a bit more formal. The content of the article is neutral, it does not represent a positive portrayal nor a negative one. I think that the phrase "one of the areas most famous tourist attractions" could be taken out because I didn't see that in the cited article and I feel like this phrase might come across a bit biased.

Sources and References Most of the sources seem reliable, the author does cite a few magazines but they seem like reliable sources. The last paragraph of lyrical interpretation is not cited. I would either include the source that you found this information from or remove it if you came up with the interpretation yourself.

Organization Your article is pretty straightforward and the different sections seem to be in a coherent order. There are a couple of grammatical errors but nothing very significant.

Overall Overall I think that you did a good job adding information to the section about the title and lyrics because it really adds some depth to the article and some insightful information about the song for anyone who is looking. I would recommend adding the two sections that I previously mentioned, I think it would make the article a bit more complete, although it already looks pretty good considering there is only so much you can say about a song. I also think that you are doing a great job at using a large amount of different sources which I think is really helping your article sound very neutral which is great so that way you are avoiding using one article's potential bias. Leonaaklipi (talk) 05:03, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

PEER REVIEW Hi I am linking my peer review here! Bellsam4 (talk) 23:08, 23 October 2020 (UTC)