User talk:Emmalyn Casteris/sandbox

I'd like to work with you a little closely on this tomorrow in class. It still has "A" potential (and she is VERY deserving of an article), but the "sources" sections got kind of unruly (you'll see I started wrangling them, then decided we'd better talk about what your goals were). Also, it feels like you have two introductions. Why does every section start with her full name and degree? Ssenier (talk) 00:39, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Look at you, all fancy with the subject headings! This is looking VERY good Emmalyn. And it looks like you have the "right" sources to pass muster with Wikipedia. As you cite those sources (online and book) I think you will want to remove those sections. Look carefully at other Wikipedia articles. Typically they have a section for "publications" (stuff written BY her), and then they might have a section called "Further Reading" (eg, general stuff on Bioneers or food sovereignty) or--more likely in your case--"External Links" (links to her faculty page, any YouTube talks, etc.). Everything else should show up in Wikipedia citation format under 'References" (now you have just 2, but I assume the other sources are going to be migrating to that list). Does that sound right? This is going to be a fabulous article!Ssenier (talk) 23:36, 9 April 2019 (UTC)