User talk:Emmanuel Smithers

edit[]: Thank you Anna Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:45, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Huon (talk) 19:47, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Reply Hi Huon I Appreciate your feedback - could you give me an example of the above please. [/]

Thanks 19:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Edits such as this one break the infobox and leave the article undecipherable. You have done lots of such edits. Please use the preview to have a look at what you will actually do, and use the sandbox if you wish to experiment. Adding Barnstars to articles is also inappropriate. Huon (talk) 19:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You can also chech the page history if you accidentally removed an edit. Huon (talk) 20:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

nk I see what you mean regarding formating, either or I am putting things in he wrong places?[]Thanks 20:02, 23 February 2012 (UTC) reply]] = Ok Thanks you, I thi


 * I believe you are indeed putting things in the wrong places. Infoboxes and other templates are enclosed by pairs of curly brackets (like this, but with additional parameters: infobox automobile). Adding or removing some brackets may break the infobox and lead to such formatting problems. If you want to add a template such as overly detailed to the article, please place it at the top before the infobox starts, not somewhere in between. I must also say that it's rather difficult to see how a stub can be overly detailed; in such cases it might help if you explain your reasoning on the article's talk page. Huon (talk) 20:12, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from doing what you cannot do properly. This may be perceived as vandalism or joke, and wikipedians usually frown upon those. Locador (talk) 00:28, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop playing with user pages. You are distracting people form work. This is disruption of wikipedia. Please do't invent still other ways of disruption. This will lead you to be blocked. You are strongly recommended to use sandbox for experiments. Locador (talk) 16:48, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Sir Joseph Banks Conservatory, you may be blocked from editing. The reference with the map I added to the article shows that you are a liar in your edit summaries. Locador (talk) 19:50, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


 * That didn't appear to be vandalism. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Can you read what I wrote? Removal of valid info while lying in the edit summary is deliberate destruction of article content, i.e., vandalism. Or do you want a lawyer's discussion splitting hairs on this? Locador (talk) 01:21, 25 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm looking at your edit summaries for that article and only see "...Undid revision 478445673 by Emmanuel Smithers...". I don't see anything that you wrote about his lying in the edit summary. Where is that? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 05:05, 25 February 2012 (UTC)