User talk:Emmettaking/sandbox

PEER REVIEW: Shiba Token page addition

Hi Emmettaking!

I wanted to begin by saying that I love your article topic! The buzz around the Shiba Token is likely going to build even more in the coming future, so I love that you've picked a topic that is uniquely informative, a little humorous, and one that will likely grow in importance.

Your introduction is straightforward, concise, and an excellent summation of the rest of the article. Bravo! I would like to let you know that your article does seem a little in favor of shiba coin (and the use of cryptocurrencies), and not entirely non-partisan. I would recommend utilizing articles that also pose the potential downsides/risks of Shiba Token in addition to the future/goals/upsides of the coin, as it would allow readers to understand Shiba Token from perspectives other than pro-crypto ones. Additionally, I think adding more sources, or spacing them out more evenly, might be helpful to your article. Since five of your ten sources are in the first paragraph, I think other paragraphs (particularly those that are longer, but in general) could benefit from being more heavily sourced. I think that some of your sources have a "missing title" text, and I'm not entirely sure why, but that might be something to look at. Granted, I don't know your topic personally very well, and these suggestions could be entirely off-base! These are just suggestions from the non-informed perspective :). Also, linking important terms (ie. tokenomics if it has an article about it) to their respective wikipedia articles might be helpful to non-informed readers like myself. Overall, I think you did a wonderful job and I look forward to seeing the future of this article! Super well done!

Miawach (talk) 02:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)