User talk:Emmy0286/sandbox

Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation"

 * The scope of the assignment is to leave notes about your observations and learnings from the three articles.
 * For this class, choose one from each of the following three groups for this assignment.
 * CE Biographies: Choose one
 * CE topics: Choose one
 * CE subjects: Choose one

Second scope item in Assignment

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — ~.
 * Did you do this?...

Thanks Risk Engineer (talk) 20:50, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Wellington Article Review
The structure of the evaluation allows reader to understand the material being criticized for improvements of the article can be well understood. The user also gave a more elaborate evaluation the the article by expounding on the thoughts of improving the article. The user highlighted points that the article was on topic with information about the life/accomplishments of Mr.Wellington, there were content gaps in the material. Much information was given in the article, but there wasn't depth to the information. The article lacked in giving the reader a complete understand of the information in the article, because user stated they were confused based on the content gaps in the material.Mr.Brannon (talk) 16:23, 26 March 2018 (UTC)