User talk:Emochilda7x

im awsome

Speedy deletion of Jake2matt
A tag has been placed on Jake2matt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tiptoety (talk) 05:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jake2matt
A tag has been placed on Jake2matt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kim Dent-Brown  (Talk to me)  22:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions. You obviously know enough about Wikipedia to go about starting new pages - why not try adding something that people will want to keep? It's a good feeling when your contributions aren't immediately deleted! If you need more help, click on the bit after my signature that says (talk to me!) I hope this welcome offsets the rather brusque warning about inappropriate pages above! If your page is deleted, you might like to have a look at this page which may suggest why. Kim Dent-Brown  (Talk to me)  22:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Verifiability
Plrease don't add various bits and pieces into wikipedia articles without references. Please read carefully the most basic policies summarized in Attribution. `'Míkka>t 19:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Personal info deleted
Please don't write the texts you wrote in the user page. Providing such kind of personal information is inadmissible. There in no way to verify that you are writing about yourself, rather than a classmate joker. The text is potentially harmful and insulting, and I deletd it. `'Míkka>t 19:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Critical Acclaim, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Critical Acclaim was changed by Emochilda7x (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-12-04T03:19:50+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 03:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Smosh edits
Please don't add info to wikipedia articles without references. `'Míkka>t 03:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to User:Mikkalai
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Mark (Mschel) 03:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Onorem♠Dil 10:43, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Critical Acclaim
I reverted your edit to the article Critical Acclaim because it was WP:POV and unencyclopedic. If you think I have done something incorrectly, feel free to let me know. Master of Puppets Care to share?  22:02, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
Account blocked for disruptive edits despite warnings. `'Míkka>t 09:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)