User talk:Emojojo2002

June 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Lauren Boebert, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 00:44, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Emojojo2002. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)


 * @Aoi well I did not appreciate you changing my edit. you don't have any proof to say it's a false claim!! Emojojo2002 (talk) 00:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)


 * @Aoi does Wikipedia want to put out Misinformation? Emojojo2002 (talk) 00:51, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Lauren Boebert has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. As well as the above warning, your edit summary was clearly and obviously inaccurate. Chaheel Riens (talk) 07:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm ScottishFinnishRadish. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Lauren Boebert seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:11, 21 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @ScottishFinnishRadish how is it neutral if you say it's a false claim and you have no proof that is false?
 * I've been donating to Wikipedia quite a bit in the past. if you can't be honest about what you put out there maybe I shouldn't give you my money anymore. Emojojo2002 (talk) 10:19, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Because all reliable sources say it is a false claim. We follow reliable sources.
 * On the topic of donations feel free to do as you wish. You're not giving any editors money, you're donating to the Wikimedia Foundation. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:23, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @ScottishFinnishRadish well I live here in America and I'm telling you those are not reliable sources!! and it's not neutral to say it's a "false" claim.
 * it is neutral to say it is a claim. Emojojo2002 (talk) 10:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @ScottishFinnishRadish why are you making edits about s*** you don't know about!! Emojojo2002 (talk) 10:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * who gave you to the authority to put out false information? Emojojo2002 (talk) 10:30, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022 (2)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 11:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice
ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 11:47, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 13:37, 21 November 2022 (UTC)