User talk:Emoritz2017

Ways to improve Final Encyclopedia
Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Emoritz2017, thanks for creating Final Encyclopedia!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains (talk) 02:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Emoritz2017, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Immortality have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:44, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Responding to your email. If you are the copyright holder and wish to release this material under a compatible license, please see WP:Donating copyrighted materials for an explanation of how to do it. There's a sample permission email at WP:Consent. However, citing your own work is not appropriate, because it's considered original research, so it's not a good addition to the article regardless of the copyright issue. Sorry, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Father of quantum mechanics


The article Father of quantum mechanics has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This is a position paper, not an encyclopedia article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  02:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proposed Encyclopedias (May 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Proposed Encyclopedias and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Proposed Encyclopedias, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Proposed_Encyclopedias Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bradv&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Proposed_Encyclopedias reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brad v  01:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Emma Lemma for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emma Lemma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Emma Lemma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 00:43, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Mole Day!
 Happy Mole Day 6.022x1023  Hello! Wishing you a Happy Mole Day on the behalf of WikiProject Science.


 * What is this?
 * Mole Day is an unofficial holiday celebrated among chemists, chemistry students and chemistry enthusiasts on October 23, between 6:02 a.m. and 6:02 p.m. This date is derived from the Avogadro number, which is approximately 6.022×1023, and the day is named after scientist Amedeo Avogadro.


 * What you can do!


 * Participate in our and our sister WikiProjects
 * Expand articles listed here
 * Improve science articles
 * Sign the guestbook or place User WikiProject Science on your user page.
 * Add this page to your watchlist to see what's occurring here


 * Similar events


 * Pi day
 * DNA day
 * Evolution Day
 * Yuri's Night
 * Square Root Day


 * See also


 * Observances about science
 * Observances in October

- Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe/Unsubscribe -

Sent by on behalf of WikiProject Science and its related projects. Wikiproject Science

Wikiproject Chemistry

Wikiproject Physics

WikiProject History of Science Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Yuasa Phenomenon
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Yuasa Phenomenon. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:59, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Jean-Jacques Kupiec moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Jean-Jacques Kupiec, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 18:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mitsutomo Yuasa
Hello, Emoritz2017. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mitsutomo Yuasa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Your edit to American INSIGHT has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 21:40, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Emoritz2017, I received your email but prefer to keep such discussions on-wiki. According to WP:NFCC, non-free content on Wikipedia should be used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose. In this case, one could easily write an original description of those documentaries, so there's not a proper justification for pasting in the copyrighted descriptions. Hope that makes sense. DanCherek (talk) 19:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Posting description of the book The Fairy Tale of Nuclear Fusion on Fusion power article

 * Hello Emoritz2017, I received your email but prefer to use the talk pages for any discussions. The reason that I undid your addition to Fusion power, and noted it as possible WP:BOOKSPAM in the edit summary, is that you gave book title, author and description directly in the text without giving any information from the book about fusion power. It is not my intention to question your intentions, expertise, or the value of the book. Even good faith edits can be spam, as described in WP:BOOKSPAM, which also suggests how to avoid it. If the book has useful and verifiable information relating to fusion power then please summarize or paraphrase that information in your own words and add it to the article, citing the source. I hope this answers your concerns. --MadeOfAtoms (talk) 19:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

"Mainchi Cultural prizes" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mainchi Cultural prizes. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 16 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Robert Kerber (talk) 07:10, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Philadelphia Firsts
Hello, Emoritz2017. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Philadelphia Firsts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Philadelphia Firsts


Hello, Emoritz2017. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Philadelphia Firsts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Algorithmic Culture
Hello, Emoritz2017. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Algorithmic Culture, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Unknowability moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Unknowability, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look. Onel 5969  TT me 10:24, 29 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for reviewing and the commentary. I do appreciate the challenges of getting things just right, and I do appreciate your and every editor's and reviewer's involvement in checking and improving articles. Sometimes it helps planting a seed and hoping others come by, water the grounds and fertilize and improve the articles, and remove whatever stray weeds sprout... Hopefully, this article gets more folks involved. A hundred years ago, physicists felt that they're pretty much on track 'knowing everything' and what they didn't know were just details to work out. It turns out now that, looking at Dark Matter and Dark Energy that (at least to our current 2023 understanding) makes up most of the 'stuff' in the universe. So we don't really know as much as we thought, in fact, turns out we have no idea of how much we don't know. I will definitely will be working to improve this article, and really hope others get interested and involved as well. Emoritz2017 (talk) 00:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Philadelphia Firsts Draft
Hello, Emoritz2017. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Philadelphia Firsts Draft, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to American Poetry Center and American INSIGHT. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:04, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Experimentum crucis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dualism. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)


 * thank you; corrected Emoritz2017 (talk) 06:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Philadelphia Firsts Draft


Hello, Emoritz2017. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Philadelphia Firsts Draft".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:58, 20 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey Hey man, thanks for the reminder. got too busy here. Cheers, E Emoritz2017 (talk) 02:27, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Margaret Chew Barringer
Hello, Emoritz2017. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Margaret Chew Barringer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)