User talk:Emotionhaha55

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Emotionhaha55! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 02:40, Friday, February 16, 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Emotionhaha55! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 02:50, Friday, February 16, 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I noticed that in this edit to Vajiralongkorn, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:42, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Answer : GorillaWarfare Hello. I am sorry for did not inform you about the referent but I removed that content because I saw that had incorrect meaning and I already had removed it again with the correctly referent. Could you please consider again. Thank you. -Emotionhaha55-Emotionhaha55 (talk) 02:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC) Emotionhaha55 (talk) 08:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Your edits on the pages Bhumibol Adulyadej and Vajiralongkorn
Hello Emotionhaha55,

You have edited the pages Bhumibol Adulyadej and Vajiralongkorn in the past months. Most of the edits were however deletions of information that were supported by and could well be checked via the given refs. Since it concerns information that could be seen as negative, deletion of it is a form of sensorship.

However, Wikipedia does not censor its contents. --FredTC (talk) 06:20, 19 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Answer FredTC : I am a Thai person who is interested about history of Royalty and King of Thailand. So, I saw some part of the contents had incorrect meaning and did not have any references as well. Therefore I edited those because I think information in Wikipedia should be real and correct information and has clearly references for being the useful articles to others. This is the reason why I edited, and I would like to confirm that is not the censorship. --Emotionhaha55 (talk) 08:44, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Emotionhaha55


 * One example: on 26 October 2018 you made this edit with the word "incorrect" as edit summary. It was reverted only one minute later by user GorillaWarfare with "unexplained content removal" in the edit summary. On 11 December 2018 you made exactly the same edit, now with "the references those refer to the article are not clear" as edit summary. It was reverted by me on 22 December 2018 with "Restored the original text of this section" in the edit summary. Before I did the revert, I discussed the matter with user Seligne. The information in the article that you removed was correct, the video that is mentioned, is available for inspection and the references are not "not clear". Please explain your problem or have a discussion on the talk page of the article, or maybe even involving more people by starting a discussion on a more general talk page that is followed by a lot of users. --FredTC (talk) 11:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Read this before contributing on talk pages
Talk page guidelines --FredTC (talk) 11:27, 7 January 2019 (UTC)