User talk:Emperor/Archive 2011

Nomination of Tor Cyan for deletion
The article Tor Cyan is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tor Cyan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:31, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Comicyr
Template:Comicyr has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 16:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:London_falling_1_6.jpeg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:London_falling_1_6.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Closedmouth (talk) 08:12, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Welcome back!
Welcome back to WikiProject Anthroponymy! Come check out our new layout.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Anthroponymy at 07:03, 26 January 2011 (UTC).

Feb 2011 Newsletter
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Anthroponymy at 06:32, 2 February 2011 (UTC).

2000 AD (comics) queries

 * Page Friday (comics) says that Friday (comics) met Judge Dredd in an issue-length story (Judge Dredd: "Casualties Of War" (by John Wagner and John Higgins, in 2000 AD #900, 1994)) and the Rogue Trooper ("Blue on Blue" (by Steve White and Henry Flint, in 2000 AD #928-931, 1995)). In summary, what happened in those stories? Is there anywhere where I can get to see those stories? (I am in Manchester in England.) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:39, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Are there any images in 2000 AD that show what Vroogmen (Nort divers/frogmen) look like? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:43, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

WP:APO template deletions
Hey guys, a couple of templates used by WP:APO have been nominated for deletion. We could use your help to Oppose their deletion. If you agree the project needs them, as per WPAPO:HN then please vote Oppose here: Templates_for_discussion

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Anthroponymy at 04:03, 24 February 2011 (UTC).

2010 Archive
Where is the link to the archive for discussions on your talk page from the year 2010? Homoaffectional (talk) 05:24, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Shimura cover.jpg
File:Shimura cover.jpg A rationale is needed for this file. We hope (talk) 18:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

WP:APO March Newsletter
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Anthroponymy at 09:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC).

Merger proposal
As someone who has edited Horror comics, you may have an opinion on a merger proposal being discussed on its talk page. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:28, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Correction and Comment. ItsLassieTime was NOT banned for plagiarism. She was banned for socking. Three years ago, ITL was first blocked, then blocked indefinitly, then banned permanently for socking. ITL is now a ban evader writing GA articles for Wikipedia. In November 2010, she had an article passed at FA as "Susanne" something or other. She then submitted another article for FA review and it was discovered then that she was a sock. She was banned again as a sock/ban evader -- not as a plagiarist. Tenebrae is now rewriting one of her early articles "Horror comics in the United State, 1946-1954. First, Tenebrae should gather the sources ITL used to build the article and methodically go through the article revising passages that are too closely paraphrased from the original source. Essentially, the job is to put some distance between the article passage and the cited source. This is a very simple process. He is not doing this. Instead, he is writing a new article using his own sources. Secondly, he needs to record the changes he makes at this artiicle at the appropriate listing at CCI to prevent other editors from picking up the article for revision and to alert those who are managing this list that work is being done on this article. Thirdly, he is using very questionalbe sources. The business about the Japanese scrolls is cited to two Japanese museums. Neither of these museums posit any connection between the ghost scrolls and the western horror comic book. None whatsoever. One could just as easily say comic books are descendants of Greek vase paintings depicting gorgons and sphinxes. The passage in the article is actually a "fringe theory" of Stephen Bissette, a cartoonist whose only education is a two year cartooning course at a vocational school in New York City. Wikipedia does not publish fringe theories. Bissette is not a scholar, although he presents himself as one. Tenebrae cites him to some weird sort of promotional blurb that offers a movie of Bissette "lecturing" on horror comics. There's some sort of fee involved. What ever this business is, it is not a reliable, scholarly source. And the sad fact is this entire article could be sourced to reliable, scholarly sources from academic presses rather than these unscholarly, "fanboy" type things that are out of print and difficult to locate. I hope some others will get on this case about this. DoverWheels (talk) 14:35, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, Emp. Since DoverWheels, or whatever this now-blocked editor is calling him/herself now, is speaking about me behind my back and not on my talk page, I hope you won't mind my alerting you that I've responded to these claims and accusations at User talk:DoverWheels. Thanks, and I hope I'm not being a bother. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:33, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

GA Review for G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (Marvel Comics)
Hello, I know that you are extremely busy, but if you have the time, please check out this discussion, on the proposed reassessment of G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (Marvel Comics) as a GA-class article. The discussion there has gotten heated, because of a debate about sources, and the GAR was proposed while a peer review is still in progress. I would appreciate you giving your opinion as to what can be done. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 12:55, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Extra eyes
Could you take a look at the material is editing and my interaction with him.

Thanks,

- J Greb (talk) 19:07, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Edward Berridge for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward Berridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edward Berridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Skomorokh  15:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Hungarian Comics
Hi!

Sorry for nagging you with this article, but I thought you might help. About 2 years ago you checked the article above (checked against B-class) and gave me some advises on future editing. I took your advises and besides them made some major changes with the article (completely rewritten the current scene chapter, restructured references and notes, etc.) At the moment I think the article reached a stage where it would need some outsiders point of view on how to make it better, what are its flaws, could it reach a better class, etc. I listed it at request for review. I haven't received any answers there, so I don't know if that's a working solution. Anyhow, I'd be happy if some comics project editors could check it out. Thanks! Zoli79 (talk) 16:42, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:JLA-100-08.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JLA-100-08.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Grant Morrison photo
Hi. Your opinion on what would be the best photo for the Infobox in the Grant Morrison article is requested here. If you could take the time to participate, it would be greatly appreciated, but if you cannot, then disregard; you don't have to leave a note on my talk page either way. Nightscream (talk) 01:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

I need your opinion
Hi. I have a question for which I need objective opinions. Can you offer your viewpoint here? I really need it in order to proceed. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Television programs based on Stephen King&#39;s works
Category:Television programs based on Stephen King&, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:12, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Comics based on Stephen King&#39;s works
Category:Comics based on Stephen King&, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 23:52, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Comics based on the works of Clive Barker
Category:Comics based on the works of Clive Barker, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 23:52, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Comics based on the works of Robert E. Howard
Category:Comics based on the works of Robert E. Howard, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 23:52, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Films based on comics by Alan Moore
Category:Films based on comics by Alan Moore, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 17:10, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Batman work group
Hello! Just wanted to take a moment to let you know about the newly created Batman work group, a part of WikiProject Comics designed to improve the classification and coverage of Batman-related articles on Wikipedia. You are invited to join the group, by adding your name to the list of participants. Feel free to pass this message along, to anyone else you know who would be interested. Thank you for your time and consideration, and we look forward to hearing from you! Fortdj33 (talk) 02:07, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Comics based on sports
Category:Comics based on sports, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 15:40, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Comics based on wrestling
Category:Comics based on wrestling, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 15:41, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In George Langelaan, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Mauzac (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC)