User talk:Emperor Dust

November 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Boss Baby: Family Business, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.   wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  04:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Dear Evan Hansen (film), as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:17, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Dear Evan Hansen (film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:17, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Hi Emperor Dust! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Dear Evan Hansen (film) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Apparently, I have already warned you about this behavior last month. Please stop incorrectly marking your edits as minor. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Wild. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dear Evan Hansen (film), you may be blocked from editing. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 19:41, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Dear Evan Hansen (film). – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 22:33, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm NeoBatfreak. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. File:Ghostbusters - Afterlife official theatrical poster.jpg

I have blocked you for 24 hours for disruptive editing, specifically genre warrior editing. PhilKnight (talk) 07:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Stop making unconstructive edits. Your editing habits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. This has been your first warning. Cardei012597 (talk) 21:15, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Schindler's List, you may be blocked from editing. ''You've already received multiple warnings for the edits you've made regarding film genres. It's disappointing to see you continuing this trend.'' DonIago (talk) 03:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild
Hello,. I'm ZX2006XZ. I noticed you added an infobox for The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild, in the section of the same name for Ice Age (franchise). Could it be that you're making a makeshift article or something until the draft is in article mainspace? If so, thanks. Here is the draft for further reference.

Draft:The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild

ZX2006XZ (talk) 18:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Film genre in opening sentence
Hi, Emperor Dust. Film articles' opening sentences should not be overloaded with all possible genres. Per WP:FILMLEAD, it should be "the primary genre or sub-genre under which it is verifiably classified". Furthermore, "Genre classifications should comply with WP:WEIGHT and represent what is specified by a majority of mainstream reliable sources." So a film's opening sentence should not mash up different genres into one messy combination, like "3D comedy adventure family film". No source calls the film that term. The term needs to be more straightforward and in line with sources, and the rest of the lead section can cover other aspects of the film. Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 19:12, 14 April 2022 (UTC)