User talk:Emperors Harbinger

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- S iva1979 Talk to me  06:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Consensus
Please do not edit guidelines for which other people have agreed consensus, as you did to WikiProject Warhammer 40,000/Notability without discussing things on the talk page, especially if you are going to mark such edits as "minor". --Pak21 08:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The main page characters have been extensively debated. You can claim that no consensus exists, but there is a much stronger claim of consensus there than there is for your arbitrary edits. If you wish to join in the debate, please do so, but if you're just going to make significant changes to pages and mark them as minor, please be aware that this is considered a form of disruption and could lead to you being blocked. --Pak21 20:47, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Extensively debated my foot! All I see is a few 'insiders' abitraraly dictateing policy to the rest of us. Next time put the voteing out in the open, not on its own special page. Untill then I am going to open these questions to general veiw and debate. Emperors Harbinger 22:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

It
Do you think it helpful to revert to a flat-out contradiction of common English usage and hence POV pushing on the God article. Str1977 (smile back) 23:02, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * YES. Emperors Harbinger 23:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Servo skull
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page such as Servo skull, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. . NawlinWiki 18:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I am incredibly confused as to what your problem with the page is and more over why you feal so vehimently that it is inapropriate. The page directly relates to a published fictional universe and further it is quite within the bounds of wikipideas acceped remit. Please explain your dissagrement with the page and demonstrate a bit more restraint in use of the athority you have earned. Cheers! Emperors Harbinger 18:49, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Imperiaform Govornment
Your recent edit to Imperiaform Govornment (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

And this is why robots will never replace humans... Emperors Harbinger 20:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Civility
It seems to me that you have acted in an uncivil manner on User_talk:AntiVandalBot. It is important to keep a cool head, despite any comments against you. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and action can be taken against the other parties if necessary. Your involvement in attacking back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors, and lead to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! --Muéro(talk/c) 00:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

My temper did run a bit high there but I stand by my statement as brutaly honest if undoubtably not very polite. Cheers! Emperors Harbinger 16:18, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

List of democratic states
I posted this in response to your comment on the talk page. I feel that it is important that you read it, and somehow, I get the impression that, despite the fact it is one of your 'special projects', that you may not visit the page for a while...


 * Was that really needed? First, you come in and tell everyone that no one is actually doing anything. Instead, they are discussing it, attempting to gauge the opinion of the rest of the community. Then, you say that you are going to do something. What do you do? You list it on your userpage. Oh, well done. To make it worse, you then tell people who do not wish to help with your 'special project' to 'sod off'. There are plenty of people, like myself, who are reading this, but have no interest in helping an offensive person such as yourself, who has recieved warnings for creating unwanted pages, and been approached about their uncivil manner, with one of their 'Special Projects'. Perhaps they are just interested in helping with the article in general? Perhaps they want the article to be deleted? There are plenty of reasons that a person would be reading this, and not want to help with your project, and there is no reason to tell them to 'sod off'. Also, can I just ask what you have actually done with this article while it has been a 'special project' of yours? Another point- have you considered that, even if a 'leader' was wanted, that someone who took the time to bother to spell words correctly may well be slightly more respected than yourself? J Milburn 10:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I go away for a week and they start complaining again... Sheash. It is a special project, I am working on it. Emperors Harbinger 00:57, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * As I explained, I am not one of 'them'. I would have forgotton about the article, did you not type that on the talk page. J Milburn 12:03, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

The Future of WP:40k
Hello. As a member of WP:40K I ask you to share your thoughts and opinions on a matter that I feel will shape the future of the project. Thanks. --Falcorian (talk) 02:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Warhammer 40K Project updated
The Warhammer 40,000 project page has been updated! Protonk (talk) 05:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Sent with Auto Wiki Browser to all 40K project members.
 * Assessment tags have been added to the project banner.
 * New material, including transwiki instructions and an organizational chart, has been added to the main project page.
 * Please help us get the Warhammer 40K project back on track!

Project activity
This message is a test to check to see if members of the Warhammer 40K Project are still online, active and interested in helping the project. If you are no longer interested in the project all you need to do is...nothing! If you don't respond to this I'll take your name off the list and you'll never here from us again. If you're the proactive type you can remove the name yourself or talk to me and I'll do it.

If you are still interested in helping out the 40K project or otherwise still want to be listed there you can say so in response to this message on your talk page or on mine. Alternately you can add our new userbox (User WikiProject Warhammer 40,000) to your userpage and I'll take that as a response. The userpage doesn't automatically include people in a category of members yet, but it might in the future.

We've assessed most of the articles in the project on the Version 1.0 assessment scale (the table on the project page should take a few days to update) but we need to push to get the core articles in the project up to GA status. Thanks for all your help. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help the project along. Protonk (talk) 21:08, 29 August 2008 (UTC)