User talk:Empiretr00per/Don Melia

Peer Review

 * Lead
 * So I think you did the same thing I did and included your Leads thing under your Don Melia heading. I think some of that might have to be shifted up to the actual Leads area. But the section in and of itself is really great and helps express the notability perfectly.
 * Content
 * I think your content is really good! It's relevant and nothing feels like it doesn't belong. I would maybe see if there's any information available about his education or if there's anything about how he got into comics, but besides that everything looks great!
 * Tone and Balance
 * I think your tone is perfect. You address the notability without sounding too steered in one direction. You did a great job at remaining objective and neutral.
 * Sources and References
 * It looks like you have a great amount of sources and references for the article length. I clicked around on a few and they all seem to work and reflect the information you have in your article.
 * Organization
 * I think your organization is great. Once you shift the information that belongs in the Leads up there, it'll be even better! I think all of your headings are substantial and are each contributing important info!
 * Images and Media
 * So, I'm trying to figure out how to work around copy-writed images myself, but if you can figure it out, an image of his characters or something would be really cool to add!
 * For New Articles
 * I think you did a great job and explaining the notability and representing this artist accurately!
 * Overall Impressions
 * Overall, I think you did great. This article looks super polished and all the info seems great. I think you should probably add a little more in the early life and career subcategory, but that's really the only thing that stuck out to me a lot! Good luck on the rest of your project, and great job!

Elid 389 (talk) 14:55, 1 November 2022 (UTC)