User talk:Empressplantagenet

Welcome!
Hello, Empressplantagenet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister  talk  23:06, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Elvira Dyangani Ose, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cmr08 (talk) 00:15, 11 February 2017 (UTC)


 * In reply to your message on my talk page, you are not in the wrong, and you didn't make the article inaccessible for other Wiki users, I was just pointing out that Wikipedia has a manual of style that we follow when editing. I made a point of explaining what I was fixing in the edit summary, but you followed my edit with one that used the same formatting that I had just fixed. Because of this, I figured you didn't see the edit summary, so I left the message here because I knew you would see it here. That's all I was doing, fixing the text so it followed manual of style. Another editor has also cleaned up a bit, and tagged the article for primary sources, so that's the only real issue that needs to be addressed now. Cmr08 (talk) 05:34, 11 February 2017 (UTC)