User talk:Emrys02

File:Rolando Royal Edition icon.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:04, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rolando Royal Edition icon.png
Thanks for uploading File:Rolando Royal Edition icon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 4 April 2019 (UTC)


 * as blocking admin. I'm inclined to lend some WP:ROPE - the timespan is suitable and the editor is acceptably straightforward about their previous actions. Nosebagbear (talk) 01:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm weary of the editor - virtually edit they made in 2019 were unconstructive, but if you wish to give them another shot, I won't stand in your way. Sergecross73   msg me  02:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I understand that and hope I can earn your trust back in future. Emrys02 (talk) 15:32, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * No more "shit?" No more personal opinions? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:10, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
 * None whatsoever. Emrys02 (talk) 00:42, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Will ask blocking admin. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Leaning unblock. However, it would be a WP:LASTCHANCE with zero tolerance for "shit posting", vandalism, WP:OR, and probably any disruption at all. Think very carefully about whether you can edit under a "your next mistake will be your last" unblock condition right now. It would be very hard to return from a second indefinite block. You might want to withdraw this unblock request and try again later. --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * As I mentioned before, I won't object if you or anyone else decides to unblock him, though I agree, this would probably be a last chance. Any more hoax nonsense and it's over. Sergecross73   msg me  16:34, 13 August 2022 (UTC)