User talk:Emsisi

Simply a test! Emsisi (talk) 16:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:39, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Survey
Hi Emsisi!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 23:05, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Article review: Feminine style of management
Hey there; it's your friendly campus ambassador(s) doing the rounds on your group's work so far!

Overall this article is informative, but there are a couple tweaks you could do to make things clearer. I'll break it down by section:

Introduction: Looking good! You might want to trim out a few adverbs (generally, more recently, etc) to make it flow better, but you've done a great job of hitting all the most important points clearly. History: I like the information you've got here; it sets up the rest of the article well. My main complaint is that it jumps from the 1970s back to the Revolutionary War; try reordering those paragraphs. Also, take another look at that sentence on WWI, since "home front" seems like the opposite of what you meant to say. Lastly, see if you can give some international perspective on all of this: How has feminine management progressed in other parts of the world? You can also throw in some links to other articles (e.g. Revolutionary War, Great Depression) for readers who weren't taught much American history. Characteristics: This is a very informative section, but I had to read it a couple times to understand everything. You could start by outlining (or linking to) the three main types of managerial styles. I know you have this information in there, but it would be much clearer if you gave some indication of what you're about to explain. The next paragraph is a great overview, but doesn't have a lot of meat: How are the accomplishment and interpersonal styles different in men and women? What does it mean to be task- or relationship-oriented? If you can cite any specific studies, that would be extremely helpful. Examples: Fill this out, obviously. References: Good job here; the information you've got in the article is well-cited. Needless to say, keep adding references as you include more information.

That's about all I've got for now. Once you've expanded a bit and tightened up some wording, this article should be looking great. -Veret (talk) 17:28, 3 November 2011 (UTC)