User talk:Enabler 77

Welcome!
Hello, Enabler 77, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Alexbrn (talk) 18:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

November 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Craniosacral therapy; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 18:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Stop
If you continue antagonizing other editors with made-up, inappropriate warnings, you will be blocked. Praxidicae (talk) 19:05, 20 November 2020 (UTC) {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Praxidicae, with respect, this sounds like a threat that I feel is unjustified. I assume you're referring to the discussion about. I added several reliable sources to the article and removed some opinion pieces. The edits were reverted twice in a row by a user claiming that I was 'whitewashing'. My goal was to introduce balance to the article, per the discussion in talk. I'm not a 'believer,' nor interested in pseudoscience. Per Wikipedia guidelines, I sent him a notice that he appeared to be engaging in edit warring. I fail to see how that's a made-up, inappropriate warning. Enabler 77 (talk) 19:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)